The Bacon legacy
One of the most important men of this entire era was the Rosicrucian, Francis Bacon. His
influence was colossal. He was the Grand Master of the Rosicrucians in England, a
major force in the creation of Freemasonry, the ‘father’ of modern science, and the
possible author of the ‘Shakespeare’ plays. He was also a member of a secret society
called the Order of the Helmet, dedicated to the worship of the goddess of wisdom,
Pallas Athene, who was portrayed as wearing a helmet and holding a spear.8 Researchers
and investigators like Manly P. Hall, the renowned Freemasonic historian, have little
doubt that Bacon was born from a liaison between Queen Elizabeth I, the ‘virgin queen’,
and her lover Robert Dudley, the Earl of Leicester.9 He was brought up by Nicholas and
Anne Bacon and would become the most influential man in the country, overtly and
covertly, with the title of Viscount of St Albans and the role of Lord Chancellor of
England. (This was the Bacon role, you might say.) If Bacon was the son of Queen
Elizabeth (El-lizard-birth), he was of a reptilian bloodline, and this would explain his
rapid rise to prominence in politics and the secret societies. He worked secretly through
the underground channels, among them the Inns of Court, the centre of the Brotherhoodcontrolled
legal profession which is based on the former Templar lands in the now aptly
161
named, Temple Bar, in London. It was a time of great conflict and upheaval as the
Brotherhood sought to use the church as a vehicle for widespread war and chaos. One
of their frontmen for this was Martin Luther, a product of German secret societies and a
Rosicrucian. His personal seal was a rose and cross. In 1517, this professor of theology
at Wittenberg University listed 95 complaints against the Vatican for selling pardons to
raise money to build St Peter’s Church. Luther was excommunicated, but he burned the
decree along with copies of Roman Church law and launched his own Lutheran Church.
Protestant Christianity had begun and conflict was unleashed across Europe as
Protestants and Catholics went to war to decide which version of the same nonsense
would prevail. Funny that the Rosicrucians claimed to stand for religious and political
freedom and yet one of their puppets, Martin Luther, stood for anything but. He hated
freethinking and open minded research. In one sermon he said that his followers should
throw spit in the face of reason, because she was the Devil’s whore, rotten with the itch
of leprosy, and should be kept in the toilet.10 Lovely. He also wrote:
“Damned be love into the abyss of hell, if it is maintained to the damage of faith... It is
better that tyrants should sin a hundred times against the people than the people should
sin once against the tyrants... the ass wants to be thrashed, the mob to be governed by
force.”11
Speak for yourself, darlin’. A Frenchman, known in English as John Calvin, also
produced his version of Protestant Christianity, another extreme and arrogant creed
called Calvinism. This spawned the Puritan movement which was so influential in the
European occupation of North America. The Protestant Church came to England
because King Henry VIII wanted a son and heir and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon,
had produced ‘only’ a daughter. He wanted to divorce her and try his luck elsewhere,
but Pope Clement VII refused to sanction this. Henry at this time was a committed
Catholic, at least in public, and the Pope had awarded him the title Defender of the
Faith. Ironically, this same title, awarded by a Roman Catholic Pope, is still held by
British monarchs to this day to defend the Protestant faith! You’ve got to chuckle,
really. What a farce it all is. Henry, being much miffed by the Pope’s refusal to sanction
his divorce, ordered Parliament to create a Church of England, independent of Rome.
He made himself the head of the new Church in the Act of Supremacy of 1534 and
unleashed a bloody purge against Roman Catholics. Henry was succeeded by his only
son, Edward, but after he died at the age of 15, he was replaced by Henry’s daughter,
Mary. She was a staunch Roman Catholic who earned the title ‘bloody Mary’ for her
purge of Protestants. Mary had secured the throne by executing her rival, Lady Jane
Grey, the ‘six-day queen’. With Mary’s death came the legendary reign of Elizabeth I,
Henry’s daughter by Anne Boleyn. Elizabeth executed her rival, Mary Queen of Scots,
from the House of Stuart, and Elizabeth proceeded to restore the Church of England
with herself as Supreme Head. She ordered a purge against Catholics which was to earn
her the title of ‘bloody Elizabeth’. Nice family.
162
It was against this backdrop that Francis Bacon emerged as a very high initiate of the
secret knowledge in the reign of his probable mother Elizabeth I, and her successor
James I, the Scottish king who united the English and Scottish monarchy when he was
crowned in 1603 as the first king of both countries. It was Bacon, with Robert Fludd,
Grand Master of the Priory of Sion, who oversaw the translation of the King James
version of the Bible, a book which, according to a study in 1881, has at least 36,1~
translation errors. Given that Bacon was an extremely educated and intelligent man, I
can’t believe that such a mess could have been made of the Bible translation on such a
scale unless it was meant that way. Bacon also removed the two Books of Maccabees
from his version which, significantly, were hostile to the secret society called the
Nazarenes, a Brotherhood offshoot at the time of the mythical Jesus. Bacon has also
been dubbed the ‘father’ of modern science - this-world-is-all-there-is science - which
has focused only on the physical level of existence. Why would Bacon support such a
version of ‘science’ when he was an advanced initiate of the secret knowledge and
knew the truth? There’s something seriously not right about all this, especially when
you consider that other ‘fathers’ of modern science like Isaac Newton and Robert Boyle
were also advanced initiates as Grand Masters of the Priory of Sion. Here you have
Bacon, a leading initiate of the secret knowledge, involved, via the Rosicrucians and
other networks, in the dividing of the Christian Church, the writing of the Christian
Bible, and the creation of modern ‘science’ which challenged many of the basic
foundations of Christianity. He was playing two sides against each other to create an
environment in which another, unspoken, Agenda could flourish. Certainly this period
produced the classic control system of divide and rule. Mass slaughter erupted across
Europe in the Protestant-Catholic wars, while, at the same time, both creeds were being
challenged by the emerging ‘scientific’ dogma.
It was also under the influence of Bacon and other esoteric magicians like John Dee
and Sir Francis Walsingham, that the spy networks across Europe, now known as British
Intelligence, were created. British Intelligence was formed by the reptilian bloodlines of
the Babylonian Brotherhood and British Intelligence would later create American
Intelligence and similar networks throughout the expanding British Empire, which are
still at work today. The CIA was created by Elite members of British Intelligence during
the presidency of the 33rd degree Freemason, Harry S. Truman, the man who officially
ordered the bombs to be dropped on Japan. He took his advice from Bill Donovan, the
head of the CIA’s predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), which was peopled
entirely by Knights Templar according to Bill Cooper, a former operative with US Naval
Intelligence. Walsingham was posted as ambassador to France to expand the spy networks
and it was no surprise when a French Intelligence agent told me that British and French
Intelligence are the same organisation. It certainly makes the cover up of Princess Diana’s
murder easier. The intelligence agencies of the world, at their peaks, are esoteric, black
magic secret societies working to the same Agenda - global control. John Dee was the
Queen’s astrologer, a Rosicrucian Grand Master, a black magician, and a secret agent for
the new intelligence network. He appears to have had a copy of the Book of Enoch from
163
some source or other and he, and the psychic Edward Kelley, developed a written
language they called ‘Enochian script or cipher’ from communications with the angels -
reptilians. Dee signed his reports 007- the same, of course, as James Bond, the stories
written by a 20th century agent of this same British Intelligence, Ian Fleming, a friend
of the black magician, Aleister Crowley. Dee travelled throughout Europe manipulating,
gathering information and oiling the networks. One of his haunts was Bohemia and he was
closely associated with Emperor Rudolf II of the reptilian Habsburg dynasty, another
occultist.12 Dee was among the influential voices who were orchestrating a policy of
British expansionism which became the British Empire. While in Prague, Dee gave
Emperor Rudolph an illustrated manuscript written in code and claimed to be the work of
Roger Bacon (Roger, not Francis), the 13th century Franciscan monk who upset the church
authorities with his views and ideas. These included prophecies about the microscope,
telescope, car, submarine, aeroplane and the belief that the Earth was a sphere and not flat.
In 1912, this same manuscript was bought by an American book dealer called Wilfred
Voynich and became known as the Voynich Manuscript. When he sent copies to the
experts of the day, they said that most of the hundreds of plants illustrated did not grow on
this planet. Some of the illustrations looked like tissue seen under a microscope and others
were of star systems and constellations. The best code breakers available to United States
Intelligence in both the First and Second World Wars tried to decipher what they called:
“the most mysterious manuscript in the world”, but none of them could do it. William
Romaine Newbold, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, claimed to have decoded
some of it in 1921. He said that part of the text read:
“In a concave mirror, I saw a star in the form of a snail between the navel of Pegasus, the
girdle of Andromeda, and the head of Cassiopeia.”13
What is described in the manuscript acquired by Dr John Dee is now known to be
accurate and the illustration it contains of the Andromeda nebula is also correct, but it is
depicted from an angle which cannot be seen from Earth! This manuscript is just one
example of the level of knowledge the Brotherhood were working with hundreds of
years ago while their other wing, the religions, were keeping the masses in the most
basic ignorance. In this John Dee-Francis Bacon circle were all the leading figures of
Elizabethan society, including Sir Walter Raleigh. It may have been Francis Bacon who
communicated some of the secret knowledge ‘for those who have ears’ in ciphers and
symbolism in the works called the Shakespeare plays. He, like the writers of the Old and
New Testaments and the King Arthur ‘Grail’ stories, was a high initiate of the secret
mysteries communicating through code and hidden meaning. Manly P. Hall says that
Bacon indicated that he was the true author in a series of codes. His esoteric number was
33 and on one page in the first part of the ‘Shakespeare’ play, Henry The Fourth, the
name ‘Francis’ appears 33 times. Bacon also used watermarks in paper to transmit his
symbols, as did the Rosicrucians and secret societies in general. These included the rose
and the cross and bunches of grapes - the vine, the bloodlines.14 Bacon also used Tarot
164
symbolism in his codes, including the numbers 21, 56 and 78, which are related to
divisions in the Tarot deck.15 In a Shakespearean Folio of 1623, the Christian name of
Bacon appears 21 times on page 56.16 The term Rota Mundi frequently occurs in the
early manifestos of the Fraternity of the Rose Cross. Rearrange the letters in Rota and
you get Taro, the ancient name for the tarot cards.’7 Shakespeare is known as the Bard.
A Bard was a Druidic initiate of the secret knowledge and, the Concise Oxford
Dictionary tells me, there is another definition of bard... “a slice of bacon placed on
meat or game before roasting”. The famous Globe Theatre in London where the plays
were performed was built according to the principles of sacred geometry and the last
‘Shakespeare’ play, The Tempest, included many Rosicrucian concepts.18 It is equally
possible that the ‘Shakespeare’ plays were written by another initiate of Elizabethan
society, Edward De Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, who also fitted the bill and some
believe even more so than Bacon.
The idea that the world famous plays were written by an illiterate from Stratford-upon-
Avon called William Shakespeare is patently ridiculous and, like so much accepted ‘truth’,
does not survive the most basic research. Shakespeare, the ‘Bard’, grew up in Stratford, a
town with no school capable of communicating such a high degree of learning. His parents
were illiterate and he showed a total disregard for study. Yet the plays were written by
someone with a great knowledge of the world which could be gleaned only from a
fantastic range of books and personal experience through travel. Shakespeare had no such
library, not that he could have used it if he had, and he is never known to have left the
country. Bacon had just such a library and travelled widely to many of the places featured
in the plays. Where did Shakespeare acquire his knowledge of French, Italian, Spanish,
Danish and classic Latin and Greek? Answer, he didn’t. Ben Jonson, a close friend of
Shakespeare, said that the ‘Bard’ understood: “small Latin and less Greek!”19 But Bacon
and DeVere were learned in these languages. Shakespeare’s daughter, Judith, was known to
be illiterate and could not even write her name at the age of 27.20 It really makes sense that
a man who wrote so eloquently would have a daughter who could not write her signature.
There are only six known examples of Shakespeare’s own handwriting, all signatures, and
three of these are on his will. They reveal a man unfamiliar with a pen and a hand that was
probably guided by another. His will included his second best bed and a broad silver gilt
bowl, but nothing whatsoever to suggest that he wrote or owned a single work of
literature!21 Nor is there one authentic portrait of Shakespeare. The differences in the
depiction of him by artists confirm that no-one has any idea what he looked like. Yet the
power of conditioning and accepting the official line attracts millions of people to Stratford
from all over the world to see the home of the man who didn’t write the Shakespeare plays!
This is only one small example of how the official fairy story called ‘history’ is used to
control current behaviour and perception. What else in history isn’t true? Just about
everything. Behind the Shakespeare plays was the hidden hand behind most historical
events of significance - the Brotherhood networks. And nothing sums up the attitude of this
group better than the words Bacon/DeVere wrote for the witches in his play, Macbeth:
“Fair is foul and foul is fair.” As Manly P. Hall, the Freemasonic historian, wrote of Bacon:
165
“He was a Rosicrucian, some have intimated the Rosicrucian. If not actually the Illustrious
Father C.R.C. referred to in the Rosicrucian manifestos, he was certainly a high initiate of
the Rosicrucian Order... those enthusiasts who for years have struggled to identify Sir
Francis Bacon as the true “Bard of Avon” might long since have won their case had they
emphasised its most important angle, namely, that Sir Francis Bacon, the Rosicrucian
initiate, wrote into the Shakespearean plays the secret teachings of the Fraternity of R.C.
and the true rituals of the Freemasonic Order, of which order it may be discovered that he
was the actual founder.“22
The rituals and symbols of Freemasonry can be traced back to ancient Egypt and
beyond. In truth, its knowledge of sacred geometry, numbers and form, go back to before
the last cataclysm. The Dionysiac Artificers or Architects, composed of initiates of the
Bacchus-Dionysus (Sun) Mysteries whose role it was to design the public buildings and
monuments, can be traced back at least three thousand years if not more.23 It was these
architect-initiates who designed the great buildings of Constantinople, Rhodes, Athens
and Rome and it was this same stream who built the temple to the goddess Diana at the
world centre for the Diana cult at Ephesus,24 which is remembered as one of the wonders
of the ancient world. The Dionysiac Architects were connected with a secret society
called the lonians (hence the island of lona in Scotland) who were apparently the people
who commissioned the Temple of Diana. Under other names, the Dionysian Architects
and initiates from the Frater Solomonis mystery school also built great Christian
Cathedrals funded by the Knights Templar. There were many Rosicrucian and Masonic
emblems to be seen in the carvings of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and numerous
depictions of compasses, squares and building tools before they were destroyed during
the French Revolution.25 The Bacchus-Dionysus architects were divided into
communities headed by Masters and Wardens, just as Freemasonry is today, and they
settled in Israel where some researchers link them with the Essenes, the Egyptian sect
who produced the Dead Sea Scrolls.26 Bacchus-Dionysus (two names for the same deity)
was a symbol of the Sun who was said to have been born to a virgin on December 25th.
The foundation of Freemasonic legend and ‘history’ centres on the building of the
symbolic King Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem. The Freemasonic hero is Hiram Abiff,
the ‘son of the widow’ in their folklore. This is more symbolism. In Egypt, Horus
(Tammuz) was the son of the widow, Isis.
The creation of Freemasonry in the 16th and 17th centuries pulled together many of
the various themes, agendas and organisations I have highlighted so far. It connected
the Rosicrucians and Templars in England, like Bacon, with the story of the Templars
after their arrival from France at the time of Philippe the Fair, and their subsequent
return to France as the Scots Guard. It also connects this group with the Priory of Sion.
The figure which encapsulated these connections was James VI of Scotland, who
succeeded Elizabeth I and became James I of England and Scotland. He was the only
child of Mary Queen of Scots. The Stuart bloodline with its connections to the reptilian
Merovingians was now on the throne of both England and Scotland. Under James’s
166
patronage, the Scottish and Templar knowledge and the Rosicrucian knowledge of
Francis Bacon and others could merge and become united under the name, Freemasonry.
So could the knowledge of the reptilian House of Lorraine, another bloodline of King
James. He had the whole set, this guy. For this reason, and others, you find the names
‘James’ and ‘St James’ appear many times in the titles of Brotherhood companies,
organisations and their locations. The American ambassador to London is known as the
Ambassador to the Court of St James. Close to the Houses of Parliament in London you
find St James’s Square and here is the headquarters of the Conservative Party; the
biggest British trade union, the Transport Union; a building owned by the Scottish
reptilian bloodline, the Keswicks (of which more later); and in the centre is a massive
round church dedicated to St John (Nimrod).
One of his first acts as King James I of England and Scotland was to award a
knighthood to Bacon, and James would later appoint him Solicitor-General, Attorney-
General, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and, in 1618, Lord Chancellor and Baron
Verulam. Later Bacon was prosecuted on corruption charges and retired from official
public life. In those early years under James I, there was a wonderful opportunity to
circulate the suppressed knowledge of the ancient world if that was really the motivation
of the James-Bacon esoteric underground. But again we have the contradiction. The very
opposite happened. James employed Bacon to edit the King James version of the Bible
and launched a vicious condemnation of ‘witches and wizards’ - those among the general
population who used and communicated the esoteric knowledge. More than that, he
embarked on a vicious slaughter of them, killing thousands, and he even wrote a book
explaining how they should be identified and dealt with. Why do that if, as claimed, the
motivation of this underground stream was to protect and eventually circulate such
information? Because that was never the idea. It helps if people whose support you need
think that is your motivation, but when it comes to the crunch you walk the other way.
The hierarchy of the groups I have been highlighting don’t want to make the knowledge
available, they want to hoard it and use it to gain power on a global scale. To be honest
I’m fed up with hearing of how the Freemasons, Templars, Rosicrucians, Bacon and
others, have been protectors of the knowledge when every time the climate has been
right to make it public, including today, the opportunity is spurned. It’s bullshit. They
know that knowledge is power if you have it and others do not, so the last thing their
hierarchy wants is an informed population. Throughout Europe, the wizards and witches,
the sensitives and psychics in other words, were burned, drowned, jailed and tortured, on
the orders of people like King James and Martin Luther. Yet these were initiates using
the same knowledge the ‘wizards and witches’ were using and communicating. There
were two esoteric undergrounds and still are. The one among the people which passed on
the knowledge in secret, myth and fairy tale, to avoid the wrath of the religious and
political establishment; and the Babylonian Brotherhood underground which wanted that
knowledge for itself to control and manipulate the religious and political establishment.
So the peoples’ underground was, and is, constantly attacked and pursued by the
Brotherhood underground. Some 250,000 were murdered for being ‘wizards and witches’,
167
30,000 of them in the British Isles alone.27
The Freemasonic movement was to become a sort of central meeting place and
coordinator for the various elements of the Brotherhood network. W. Wynn Westcott,
founder of the Hermetic (and Satanic) Order of the Golden Dawn, knew the true
background to Freemasonry because of his connections to the esoteric underground. He
wrote in his work, The Magical Mason, that the Freemasons originate from the Essenes,
the Pharisee (Levite) Jews, the ancient mystery schools of Egypt and Greece, the Vehm-
Gerichte of Westphalia, Germany, the Roman Collegia, the French Compagnons, and
the Rosicrucians.28 The official (and inaccurate) story is that Freemasonry emerged
from the lodges of the stone masons who worked on the great churches and cathedrals,
craftsmen with the knowledge of sacred geometry. They had enjoyed a close connection
with the Knights Templar since the building of the Gothic cathedrals. But by the time of
Henry VIII, their work was in decline. Far from building more cathedrals, Henry set
about looting the monasteries and the fraternities, brotherhoods and guilds to raise some
much needed cash. To survive, the Masonic guilds began to open their doors to non-
Masons, people from the professional classes, the businessmen, merchants, landowners
and the aristocracy. It was now freemasonry and, of course, the newcomers took over
the show very quickly, we are told. What happened, in truth, is that the Knights
Templar-Rosicrucian-Babylonian Brotherhood underground, created their own initiation
structure to pass on the secret knowledge to the chosen few and keep it out of
circulation. The mason guilds were simply a cover story.
Freemasonry was born in Scotland among the familiar Brotherhood bloodline
families, especially the reptilian St Clair/Sinclairs. They were based at Rosslyn or
Roslin Castle just south of Edinburgh in a region steeped in Templar tradition. Like all
of these bloodline families, they periodically change their name to hide their origins.
This line became the St Clairs while they were living in Normandy before they crossed
the English Channel with William the Conqueror for the Battle of Hastings in 1066 and
became the Scottish Sinclairs. Five of the nine St Clairs who took part in the battle were
William’s first cousins and one of them settled in Scotland to found the Scottish
dynasty.29 The family apparently named themselves St Clair after a martyred hermit
named Clare, or that’s the official line.30 They were the Norsemen who came down from
Scandinavia to occupy what they called Normandy, but their true origin was with the
white races and reptile-Aryans which emerged from the Near East and the Caucasus.
The foundations were laid for Rosslyn Chapel in 1446 and it was completed in the
1480s. It is a mass of esoteric and later Freemasonic symbolism and it is like a shrine
for the Brotherhood. The Sinclairs had extensive connections to the underground
networks in France, Lorraine and Guise, and with Scandinavia, Denmark and the onetime
Brotherhood financial centre in Venice. They were steeped in the reptilian
network. A Sinclair went ashore in North America with the Black Nobility Venetian,
Nicolo Zeno, a century before Christopher Columbus would do so officially. One of the
symbols at Rosslyn Chapel is the Pagan vegetation god or ‘Green Man’. Tim Wallace-
Murphy wrote in his official history of Rosslyn Chapel that the Green Man can be
168
identifiedwith Tammuz, the dying and resurrecting god of Babylon and an aspect of
Nimrod. Tammuz, and other names for the same deity, was often depicted to have a green
face. This includes Osiris, the husband-brother of Isis. The story of Robin Hood in his
‘Lincoln green’ originated with this Green Man deity. Robin Hood began in the original
legend as a species of ‘fairy’ and he was also known as Green Robin, Robin of
Greenwood and Robin Goodfellow.31 His “Shakespearean” version, Puck, in A
Midsummer Night’s Dream, presided over fertility and sexual rites at the summer solstice.
On May 1st, May Day, they had the May Pole ceremonies. The May Pole is a phallic
symbol dedicated to the goddess of sexuality and fertility and on that day every village
virgin would be a Queen of the May (Queen Semiramis). Many would end up in the green
wood to undergo a sexual initiation with a youth playing the role of Robin Hood or Robin
Goodfellow. The children that often followed nine months later were the origin of the now
common names Robinson and Robertson.32 The story of Robin Hood was another
symbolic tale to maintain the memory of Pagan sexual ritual amid the crossed legs and
scowling faces of orthodox Christianity. A play called Robin Hood and Little John was
performed every May and June at Rosslyn by gypsies or other travelling performers. Sir
William Sinclair became, for a time, a protector of gypsies when legislation was passed in
Scotland designed to wipe them out. The gypsies originated in Egypt and they carried the
knowledge from place to place and generation to generation. This is why they have been
so persecuted and hounded until most of their knowledge disappeared.
The biggest rite of world Freemasonry are the 33 degrees (initiation levels) called
the Scottish Rite. It is named after that little country in the north of the British Isles
because that is where many of the ancient bloodlines settled to be followed by the
Templar knowledge at the time of Philippe the Fair. Now the Templars had re-emerged
publicly under another name - Freemasonry. The other main stream of the ‘craft’ is the
York Rite, after which New York is named, which is the centre of United States
Freemasonry to this day. Some researchers believe that the Priory of Sion wrested
control of the Scottish and York Rites from the Templars who later crossed the English
Channel to found French Freemasonry. This may be true, but in the end they are all the
same organisation at the highest level. You can still see the influence of the Templars in
the degrees of the York Rite. The top degree is the Knights Templar Degree, followed
by the Knights of Malta Degree and the Red Cross Degree. But the official degrees are
only what they admit to. Above these levels are what I call the Illuminati degrees which
very, very few people even know about, never mind reach. The vast majority of
Freemasons never progress beyond the bottom three levels, the ‘blue degrees’, and they
are used as a front of respectability to hide the real Agenda which the rank and file are
not aware of. Albert Pike was the head of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite
of Freemasonry in the United States in the last century and is considered a Freemasonic
‘god’ in America. His statue stands in Washington DC. In his Freemasonic book,
Morals And Dogma, he writes on page 819:
“The blue degrees are, but the outer court or portico of the temple. Part of the symbols are
169
displayed there to the initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not
intended that he shall understand them, but it is intended that he shall imagine he
understands them.”
Put another way, keep them in the dark and feed them bullshit. This is the classic
secret society structure in which only the highest levels know what is really going on.
The rest are sold a myth. In the mid-i 7th century, the Thirty Years War between the
Protestant and Catholic believers had turned Europe into a cauldron of death and
mayhem. It was feared at one stage that the new Protestant movement would be routed
and the rule of Rome restored. Britain became a safe haven for the Protestant cause,
particularly under the royal house of Stuart, which ironically was not Christian at all.
But the split the Protestants created in the Christian Church, and the way the power of
Rome was thus diminished, suited the Brotherhood. The British Isles became the focus
for esoteric thought in Europe and the creation of Freemasonry wove these strands
together in one structure. Freemasonry was to quickly become a vehicle for political
and economic manipulation, its members working through all sides to the same end.
The Agenda in this period was to diminish the power of the monarchies in Europe and
replace them with political systems designed in a way that allowed the Brotherhood to
control them. It was based on the structure in ancient Sumer and Babylon and this has
continued to this very day. A series of civil wars were triggered throughout Europe
which either removed the monarchy or made them mere puppets. In the English Civil
War of 1642-1646, the Stuart king and Freemason, Charles I, was defeated and later
executed. The monarchy was briefly overthrown and replaced by a Lord Protector,
Oliver Cromwell, also a Freemason. This may sound strange and contradictory, but it
isn’t. The Agenda is the prime motivation, in fact the only motivation, of the
Brotherhood. If that means replacing a Freemason and a Stuart who won’t follow the
Agenda with a Freemason who will, then so be it. The end of the royal line for the
Stuarts is not as significant as it would seem. The Brotherhood Elite and the reptilians
do not care who introduces their Agenda, so long as someone does and the most
influential of their bloodlines are not always the most famous people. Often the most
influential ones work in the background where the real power lies. The Stuarts were fine
for a while, but everyone is expendable to the cause and by now the structures were in
place to run countries via the secret society networks, using frontmen and women. The
power of a single monarch was over and that was certainly the case in the UK after the
beheading of Charles I. Even when the monarchy was restored with Charles II, it was a
puppet of the Brotherhood and took orders in the same way that Oliver Cromwell did
when, in 1655, he allowed ‘Jewish’ (Aryan) people to return to England for the first
time since they were excluded by Edward I in 1290. As I described earlier, this was the
time when the Black Nobility in Amsterdam were preparing to put their man, William
of Orange, on the British throne.
Everything interconnects with everything else in the most remarkable way because it
is being coordinated from the lower fourth dimension which can see into this one. The
170
Christian Church was split into rival and violent factions by the Rosicrucian, Martin
Luther, and the emergence of a vicious brand of the Protestant faith called Calvinism,
later known as the Puritans. Its founder ‘John Calvin’ was actually Jean Caum from
Noyons, France, who was educated at the Brotherhood-controlled, College du Montagu.
This is also where Ignatius Loyola, the ‘Catholic’ founder of the Society of Jesus, the
Jesuits, was educated. Caum moved to Paris and then to Geneva, Switzerland, where he
was known as Cohen. This name relates to ‘priest’ and goes back to the Egyptian
mystery schools. In Geneva he developed, or someone else did, the philosophy known
as Calvinism. He changed his name again from Cohen to Calvin to make it more
acceptable to the English who now became the prime target of this new religion - yet
another created by the same source as all the others. Calvinism was a designer religion
for the next stage of the plan. It focused rigidly on the ten commandments of ‘Moses’
and the Old Testament texts (taken literally, not symbolically of course). But this was
the crucial bit. Up to this point the Christian religion had banned usury, the charging of
interest on loans. Now, with the Black Nobility bankers manoeuvring to take over
England, a Christian country, using the outwardly ‘Christian’ aristocracy, the time had
come to end that rule and make usury the norm. Calvinism, therefore, supported the
charging of interest and one of the great beneficiaries was Switzerland, where the plot
was conceived, because it became the centre of the world’s private banking system.
Another role for Calvinism was to insist on the burning of witches and in so doing take
more of the secret knowledge out of public circulation. The Black Nobility wanted their
man, William of Orange, on the throne and to do this they had to remove Charles I, the
guy they eventually beheaded in 1649. Calvinism was used to ferment unrest with the
monarchy and along came the Freemason and Calvinist, Oliver Cromwell, to play his
part in yet another manufactured conflict as his Roundheads met the Royalists in the
English Civil War. On September 3rd 1921, a publication by Lord Alfred Douglas
called Plain English presented the contents of correspondence relating to the plot
behind the murder of Charles I. It said that volumes of records had been found in the
Synagogue of Mulheim by a L. A. Van Valckert. They were written in German and had
been lost since the Napoleonic Wars. An entry for June 6th 1647, from Oliver Cromwell
to an Ebenezer Pratt, says (in modern language):
“In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England; this, however,
impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds
for which at present do not exist. Therefore, advise that Charles be assassinated, but will
have nothing to do with procuring an assassin, though willing to help with his escape.”
Ebenezer Pratt’s reply was on July 12th 1647:
“Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too
dangerous. Charles should be given the opportunity to escape. His recapture will then
make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms
171
until trial commences.”34
This publication was so revealing that the Brotherhood network had the publisher,
Lord Alfred Douglas, imprisoned on the basis of an alleged ‘libel’ printed in his paper
about Winston Churchill. How it is possible to libel a Satanist like Churchill is rather hard
to comprehend. That correspondence between Cromwell and Pratt was mirrored by actual
events. On November 12th 1647, Charles I was allowed to escape and in fact was ‘hidden’
on the Isle of Wight, just off the southern coast of England, where I am writing this
section. Charles was recaptured and when he and Parliament appeared to be close to an
agreement that would spare his life, Cromwell, by now Lord Protector, dismissed all the
members supporting an agreement. History calls what remained the ‘Rump Parliament’.
Another trial was ordered by Cromwell because his agreement with his backers in
Amsterdam was that Charles would be executed. The indictment against Charles was
drawn up by Isaac Dorislaus, the agent in England of Manasseh ben Israel, one of the
main funders from Amsterdam of the Cromwell ‘revolution’ ~ The outcome of the ‘trial’
was the public beheading of Charles and this was followed by Cromwell allowing the
‘Jews’ to return to England. I would stress again that we are not, in truth, talking about
Jews, but the financial hierarchy of the Black Nobility and the Brotherhood who hide
behind the term ‘Jews’ and mercilessly manipulate the mass of those who call themselves
Jewish. After Cromwell’s death in 1661, many of his Calvinist-Puritan followers headed
for America to escape ‘religious persecution’ following the reinstatement of the monarchy
under Charles II. These were the religious fanatics who slaughtered the Native Americans
under the banner of ‘God’. The Black Nobility bankers in Amsterdam caused a financial
depression in England to undermine Charles II. Eventually a ‘peace’ deal was struck
between Holland and England in 1667 in which William of Orange (Black Nobility)
would marry Mary, daughter of the Duke of York. When Charles II died in 1685, it was
the Duke of York who became King James II. Now all the Brotherhood had to do was
remove him from the throne and their guy would be King of England. They began to
bribe James II’s most influential aristocratic supporters and the first to bite was John
Churchill, the reptilian Duke of Marlborough. The Commissioner of Public Accounts
revealed that Churchill had taken bribes totalling some £60,000 (an absolute fortune in
those days) from representatives of Dutch and Spanish financial families like Sir Solomon
de Medina and Antonio Machado. Researcher, Euctace Mullins, puts it at more like
£350,000.36
John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough, was an ancestor of Britain’s wartime prime
minister, Sir Winston Churchill, and the Churchill-Brotherhood connections continue to
this day. Sir Winston’s daughter-in-law, Pamela, married the American, Averell Harriman,
one of the great Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century and much documented in ..
And The Truth Shall Set You Free. Pamela Harriman, who had formerly been married to
Winston’s son, Randolph, became very influential in the American Democratic Party and
is widely named as the force behind Bill Clinton’s election as US president. She was
rewarded by being made US ambassador to the key Brotherhood city of Paris, where she
172
died in 1997 at the age of 76. Her son, also named Winston, is a British member of
Parliament who is close to the Rothschilds. Pamela Churchill-Harriman dated Elie de
Rothschild before marrying Averell Harriman. In 1995 the Churchill family were given
£12,500 million of National Lottery money when they sold some of Sir Winston
Churchill’s Second World War speeches to ‘the nation’. The speeches were purchased
with this public money by the National Heritage Memorial Board, chaired by... Lord
Jacob Rothschild. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about. The Churchill-Harrimans
are bloodline families. One of Pamela Harriman’s ancestors conspired with the Percy
family, ancestors of George Bush, in the attempt to blow up the Houses of Parliament in
the so-called Gun Powder Plot led by Guy Fawkes on November 5th 1605. As a
Harriman, Pamela represented the ‘Democratic’ wing of the Brotherhood while the
Bush’s, close associates and business partners of the Harrimans, represent the
‘Republican’ wing. Both have answered to the same master to ensure that the United
States, like every other country, is a one-party-state. The Bush family are close friends
of the Windsors, which shouldn’t surprise anyone who has read this far because both
are shape-shifting reptilians. Bush and his associate, the Brotherhood’s tireless global
manipulator, Henry Kissinger, have both been knighted by Queen Elizabeth II.
The modern version of Freemasonry expanded rapidly from its obscure beginnings
among the Templars and other mystery initiates. The Grand Lodge of England - the
centre of the network - was officially formed on June 24th 1717. This is St John the
Baptist’s Day, a sacred day for the Knights Templar and an obvious connection to the
Knights of St John of Jerusalem (Malta). John the Baptist is the patron saint of both
the Freemasons and the Templars because Oannes was another form of John in
Babylon and Oannes was a another name for Nimrod. The Irish Grand Lodge followed
some six or seven years later. Most of the field lodges which emerged among the
regiments in the British army were warranted by the Irish and not the English Grand
Lodge. The Scottish clans introduced Freemasonry to their blood brethren in France
and I should mention one man in this regard, Andrew Michael Ramsey, a tutor to the
Scottish Stuart pretender to the throne, Bonnie Prince Charlie. Ramsey was born in
Scotland in the I 680s and was a close friend of Isaac Newton, the Grand Master of the
Priory of Sion. He was a member of many Elite groupings, including a sort of
Rosicrucian society called the Philadelphians (named after the city from where the
American War of Independence was orchestrated) and the French chivalric Order of St
Lazarus. Many of these Elite groups give their initiates esoteric names and Ramsey’s
Brotherhood name was ‘Chevalier’.37 He was a significant factor in the spread of
Freemasonry and he is particularly remembered in Freemasonic circles for two versions
of the same speech he made in December 1736 and March 1737. It became known as
Ramsey’s Oration and in it he charted some of the history of Freemasonry. He confirmed
that it was derived from the mystery schools of antiquity which worshipped Diana,
Minerva and Isis (Semiramis). He said that Freemasonry had its origins in the Holy Land
at the time of the Crusades (the Knights Templar) and did not originate with stone
masons. Ramsey said that ‘our Order’ (the Templars) had formed an intimate union with
173
the Knights of St John of Jerusalem (Malta) and from that time: “our lodges took the
name of Lodges of St John”.38 In France, Freemasonry, with Ramsey’s keen support,
spawned a particularly important strand, a fusion between Freemasonry and the
Jacobite movement which became known as Grand Orient Freemasonry. There are also
Grand Orient networks in others countries like Brazil and Portugal. Grand Orient means
Grand East and its rituals are inspired by the worship of Zoroaster in Persia, Ishtar and
Tammuz (Semiramis and Nimrod) in Babylon, Demeter, Persephone and Dionysus in
Greece, Aphrodite and Adonis in Syria, Isis and Osiris in Egypt, and Mithra in Persia.39
The Grand Orient in France was to be the focus behind the manipulation and
coordination of the French Revolution. From the Brotherhood’s point of view, this
‘peoples’ revolution had nothing to do with freedom and everything to do with its
Agenda for global control. The famous cry of the French revolutionaries: “Liberty,
Equality, Fraternity”, is a Freemasonic motto.
One of the most important men of this entire era was the Rosicrucian, Francis Bacon. His
influence was colossal. He was the Grand Master of the Rosicrucians in England, a
major force in the creation of Freemasonry, the ‘father’ of modern science, and the
possible author of the ‘Shakespeare’ plays. He was also a member of a secret society
called the Order of the Helmet, dedicated to the worship of the goddess of wisdom,
Pallas Athene, who was portrayed as wearing a helmet and holding a spear.8 Researchers
and investigators like Manly P. Hall, the renowned Freemasonic historian, have little
doubt that Bacon was born from a liaison between Queen Elizabeth I, the ‘virgin queen’,
and her lover Robert Dudley, the Earl of Leicester.9 He was brought up by Nicholas and
Anne Bacon and would become the most influential man in the country, overtly and
covertly, with the title of Viscount of St Albans and the role of Lord Chancellor of
England. (This was the Bacon role, you might say.) If Bacon was the son of Queen
Elizabeth (El-lizard-birth), he was of a reptilian bloodline, and this would explain his
rapid rise to prominence in politics and the secret societies. He worked secretly through
the underground channels, among them the Inns of Court, the centre of the Brotherhoodcontrolled
legal profession which is based on the former Templar lands in the now aptly
161
named, Temple Bar, in London. It was a time of great conflict and upheaval as the
Brotherhood sought to use the church as a vehicle for widespread war and chaos. One
of their frontmen for this was Martin Luther, a product of German secret societies and a
Rosicrucian. His personal seal was a rose and cross. In 1517, this professor of theology
at Wittenberg University listed 95 complaints against the Vatican for selling pardons to
raise money to build St Peter’s Church. Luther was excommunicated, but he burned the
decree along with copies of Roman Church law and launched his own Lutheran Church.
Protestant Christianity had begun and conflict was unleashed across Europe as
Protestants and Catholics went to war to decide which version of the same nonsense
would prevail. Funny that the Rosicrucians claimed to stand for religious and political
freedom and yet one of their puppets, Martin Luther, stood for anything but. He hated
freethinking and open minded research. In one sermon he said that his followers should
throw spit in the face of reason, because she was the Devil’s whore, rotten with the itch
of leprosy, and should be kept in the toilet.10 Lovely. He also wrote:
“Damned be love into the abyss of hell, if it is maintained to the damage of faith... It is
better that tyrants should sin a hundred times against the people than the people should
sin once against the tyrants... the ass wants to be thrashed, the mob to be governed by
force.”11
Speak for yourself, darlin’. A Frenchman, known in English as John Calvin, also
produced his version of Protestant Christianity, another extreme and arrogant creed
called Calvinism. This spawned the Puritan movement which was so influential in the
European occupation of North America. The Protestant Church came to England
because King Henry VIII wanted a son and heir and his first wife, Catherine of Aragon,
had produced ‘only’ a daughter. He wanted to divorce her and try his luck elsewhere,
but Pope Clement VII refused to sanction this. Henry at this time was a committed
Catholic, at least in public, and the Pope had awarded him the title Defender of the
Faith. Ironically, this same title, awarded by a Roman Catholic Pope, is still held by
British monarchs to this day to defend the Protestant faith! You’ve got to chuckle,
really. What a farce it all is. Henry, being much miffed by the Pope’s refusal to sanction
his divorce, ordered Parliament to create a Church of England, independent of Rome.
He made himself the head of the new Church in the Act of Supremacy of 1534 and
unleashed a bloody purge against Roman Catholics. Henry was succeeded by his only
son, Edward, but after he died at the age of 15, he was replaced by Henry’s daughter,
Mary. She was a staunch Roman Catholic who earned the title ‘bloody Mary’ for her
purge of Protestants. Mary had secured the throne by executing her rival, Lady Jane
Grey, the ‘six-day queen’. With Mary’s death came the legendary reign of Elizabeth I,
Henry’s daughter by Anne Boleyn. Elizabeth executed her rival, Mary Queen of Scots,
from the House of Stuart, and Elizabeth proceeded to restore the Church of England
with herself as Supreme Head. She ordered a purge against Catholics which was to earn
her the title of ‘bloody Elizabeth’. Nice family.
162
It was against this backdrop that Francis Bacon emerged as a very high initiate of the
secret knowledge in the reign of his probable mother Elizabeth I, and her successor
James I, the Scottish king who united the English and Scottish monarchy when he was
crowned in 1603 as the first king of both countries. It was Bacon, with Robert Fludd,
Grand Master of the Priory of Sion, who oversaw the translation of the King James
version of the Bible, a book which, according to a study in 1881, has at least 36,1~
translation errors. Given that Bacon was an extremely educated and intelligent man, I
can’t believe that such a mess could have been made of the Bible translation on such a
scale unless it was meant that way. Bacon also removed the two Books of Maccabees
from his version which, significantly, were hostile to the secret society called the
Nazarenes, a Brotherhood offshoot at the time of the mythical Jesus. Bacon has also
been dubbed the ‘father’ of modern science - this-world-is-all-there-is science - which
has focused only on the physical level of existence. Why would Bacon support such a
version of ‘science’ when he was an advanced initiate of the secret knowledge and
knew the truth? There’s something seriously not right about all this, especially when
you consider that other ‘fathers’ of modern science like Isaac Newton and Robert Boyle
were also advanced initiates as Grand Masters of the Priory of Sion. Here you have
Bacon, a leading initiate of the secret knowledge, involved, via the Rosicrucians and
other networks, in the dividing of the Christian Church, the writing of the Christian
Bible, and the creation of modern ‘science’ which challenged many of the basic
foundations of Christianity. He was playing two sides against each other to create an
environment in which another, unspoken, Agenda could flourish. Certainly this period
produced the classic control system of divide and rule. Mass slaughter erupted across
Europe in the Protestant-Catholic wars, while, at the same time, both creeds were being
challenged by the emerging ‘scientific’ dogma.
It was also under the influence of Bacon and other esoteric magicians like John Dee
and Sir Francis Walsingham, that the spy networks across Europe, now known as British
Intelligence, were created. British Intelligence was formed by the reptilian bloodlines of
the Babylonian Brotherhood and British Intelligence would later create American
Intelligence and similar networks throughout the expanding British Empire, which are
still at work today. The CIA was created by Elite members of British Intelligence during
the presidency of the 33rd degree Freemason, Harry S. Truman, the man who officially
ordered the bombs to be dropped on Japan. He took his advice from Bill Donovan, the
head of the CIA’s predecessor, the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), which was peopled
entirely by Knights Templar according to Bill Cooper, a former operative with US Naval
Intelligence. Walsingham was posted as ambassador to France to expand the spy networks
and it was no surprise when a French Intelligence agent told me that British and French
Intelligence are the same organisation. It certainly makes the cover up of Princess Diana’s
murder easier. The intelligence agencies of the world, at their peaks, are esoteric, black
magic secret societies working to the same Agenda - global control. John Dee was the
Queen’s astrologer, a Rosicrucian Grand Master, a black magician, and a secret agent for
the new intelligence network. He appears to have had a copy of the Book of Enoch from
163
some source or other and he, and the psychic Edward Kelley, developed a written
language they called ‘Enochian script or cipher’ from communications with the angels -
reptilians. Dee signed his reports 007- the same, of course, as James Bond, the stories
written by a 20th century agent of this same British Intelligence, Ian Fleming, a friend
of the black magician, Aleister Crowley. Dee travelled throughout Europe manipulating,
gathering information and oiling the networks. One of his haunts was Bohemia and he was
closely associated with Emperor Rudolf II of the reptilian Habsburg dynasty, another
occultist.12 Dee was among the influential voices who were orchestrating a policy of
British expansionism which became the British Empire. While in Prague, Dee gave
Emperor Rudolph an illustrated manuscript written in code and claimed to be the work of
Roger Bacon (Roger, not Francis), the 13th century Franciscan monk who upset the church
authorities with his views and ideas. These included prophecies about the microscope,
telescope, car, submarine, aeroplane and the belief that the Earth was a sphere and not flat.
In 1912, this same manuscript was bought by an American book dealer called Wilfred
Voynich and became known as the Voynich Manuscript. When he sent copies to the
experts of the day, they said that most of the hundreds of plants illustrated did not grow on
this planet. Some of the illustrations looked like tissue seen under a microscope and others
were of star systems and constellations. The best code breakers available to United States
Intelligence in both the First and Second World Wars tried to decipher what they called:
“the most mysterious manuscript in the world”, but none of them could do it. William
Romaine Newbold, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, claimed to have decoded
some of it in 1921. He said that part of the text read:
“In a concave mirror, I saw a star in the form of a snail between the navel of Pegasus, the
girdle of Andromeda, and the head of Cassiopeia.”13
What is described in the manuscript acquired by Dr John Dee is now known to be
accurate and the illustration it contains of the Andromeda nebula is also correct, but it is
depicted from an angle which cannot be seen from Earth! This manuscript is just one
example of the level of knowledge the Brotherhood were working with hundreds of
years ago while their other wing, the religions, were keeping the masses in the most
basic ignorance. In this John Dee-Francis Bacon circle were all the leading figures of
Elizabethan society, including Sir Walter Raleigh. It may have been Francis Bacon who
communicated some of the secret knowledge ‘for those who have ears’ in ciphers and
symbolism in the works called the Shakespeare plays. He, like the writers of the Old and
New Testaments and the King Arthur ‘Grail’ stories, was a high initiate of the secret
mysteries communicating through code and hidden meaning. Manly P. Hall says that
Bacon indicated that he was the true author in a series of codes. His esoteric number was
33 and on one page in the first part of the ‘Shakespeare’ play, Henry The Fourth, the
name ‘Francis’ appears 33 times. Bacon also used watermarks in paper to transmit his
symbols, as did the Rosicrucians and secret societies in general. These included the rose
and the cross and bunches of grapes - the vine, the bloodlines.14 Bacon also used Tarot
164
symbolism in his codes, including the numbers 21, 56 and 78, which are related to
divisions in the Tarot deck.15 In a Shakespearean Folio of 1623, the Christian name of
Bacon appears 21 times on page 56.16 The term Rota Mundi frequently occurs in the
early manifestos of the Fraternity of the Rose Cross. Rearrange the letters in Rota and
you get Taro, the ancient name for the tarot cards.’7 Shakespeare is known as the Bard.
A Bard was a Druidic initiate of the secret knowledge and, the Concise Oxford
Dictionary tells me, there is another definition of bard... “a slice of bacon placed on
meat or game before roasting”. The famous Globe Theatre in London where the plays
were performed was built according to the principles of sacred geometry and the last
‘Shakespeare’ play, The Tempest, included many Rosicrucian concepts.18 It is equally
possible that the ‘Shakespeare’ plays were written by another initiate of Elizabethan
society, Edward De Vere, the 17th Earl of Oxford, who also fitted the bill and some
believe even more so than Bacon.
The idea that the world famous plays were written by an illiterate from Stratford-upon-
Avon called William Shakespeare is patently ridiculous and, like so much accepted ‘truth’,
does not survive the most basic research. Shakespeare, the ‘Bard’, grew up in Stratford, a
town with no school capable of communicating such a high degree of learning. His parents
were illiterate and he showed a total disregard for study. Yet the plays were written by
someone with a great knowledge of the world which could be gleaned only from a
fantastic range of books and personal experience through travel. Shakespeare had no such
library, not that he could have used it if he had, and he is never known to have left the
country. Bacon had just such a library and travelled widely to many of the places featured
in the plays. Where did Shakespeare acquire his knowledge of French, Italian, Spanish,
Danish and classic Latin and Greek? Answer, he didn’t. Ben Jonson, a close friend of
Shakespeare, said that the ‘Bard’ understood: “small Latin and less Greek!”19 But Bacon
and DeVere were learned in these languages. Shakespeare’s daughter, Judith, was known to
be illiterate and could not even write her name at the age of 27.20 It really makes sense that
a man who wrote so eloquently would have a daughter who could not write her signature.
There are only six known examples of Shakespeare’s own handwriting, all signatures, and
three of these are on his will. They reveal a man unfamiliar with a pen and a hand that was
probably guided by another. His will included his second best bed and a broad silver gilt
bowl, but nothing whatsoever to suggest that he wrote or owned a single work of
literature!21 Nor is there one authentic portrait of Shakespeare. The differences in the
depiction of him by artists confirm that no-one has any idea what he looked like. Yet the
power of conditioning and accepting the official line attracts millions of people to Stratford
from all over the world to see the home of the man who didn’t write the Shakespeare plays!
This is only one small example of how the official fairy story called ‘history’ is used to
control current behaviour and perception. What else in history isn’t true? Just about
everything. Behind the Shakespeare plays was the hidden hand behind most historical
events of significance - the Brotherhood networks. And nothing sums up the attitude of this
group better than the words Bacon/DeVere wrote for the witches in his play, Macbeth:
“Fair is foul and foul is fair.” As Manly P. Hall, the Freemasonic historian, wrote of Bacon:
165
“He was a Rosicrucian, some have intimated the Rosicrucian. If not actually the Illustrious
Father C.R.C. referred to in the Rosicrucian manifestos, he was certainly a high initiate of
the Rosicrucian Order... those enthusiasts who for years have struggled to identify Sir
Francis Bacon as the true “Bard of Avon” might long since have won their case had they
emphasised its most important angle, namely, that Sir Francis Bacon, the Rosicrucian
initiate, wrote into the Shakespearean plays the secret teachings of the Fraternity of R.C.
and the true rituals of the Freemasonic Order, of which order it may be discovered that he
was the actual founder.“22
The rituals and symbols of Freemasonry can be traced back to ancient Egypt and
beyond. In truth, its knowledge of sacred geometry, numbers and form, go back to before
the last cataclysm. The Dionysiac Artificers or Architects, composed of initiates of the
Bacchus-Dionysus (Sun) Mysteries whose role it was to design the public buildings and
monuments, can be traced back at least three thousand years if not more.23 It was these
architect-initiates who designed the great buildings of Constantinople, Rhodes, Athens
and Rome and it was this same stream who built the temple to the goddess Diana at the
world centre for the Diana cult at Ephesus,24 which is remembered as one of the wonders
of the ancient world. The Dionysiac Architects were connected with a secret society
called the lonians (hence the island of lona in Scotland) who were apparently the people
who commissioned the Temple of Diana. Under other names, the Dionysian Architects
and initiates from the Frater Solomonis mystery school also built great Christian
Cathedrals funded by the Knights Templar. There were many Rosicrucian and Masonic
emblems to be seen in the carvings of the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and numerous
depictions of compasses, squares and building tools before they were destroyed during
the French Revolution.25 The Bacchus-Dionysus architects were divided into
communities headed by Masters and Wardens, just as Freemasonry is today, and they
settled in Israel where some researchers link them with the Essenes, the Egyptian sect
who produced the Dead Sea Scrolls.26 Bacchus-Dionysus (two names for the same deity)
was a symbol of the Sun who was said to have been born to a virgin on December 25th.
The foundation of Freemasonic legend and ‘history’ centres on the building of the
symbolic King Solomon’s Temple in Jerusalem. The Freemasonic hero is Hiram Abiff,
the ‘son of the widow’ in their folklore. This is more symbolism. In Egypt, Horus
(Tammuz) was the son of the widow, Isis.
The creation of Freemasonry in the 16th and 17th centuries pulled together many of
the various themes, agendas and organisations I have highlighted so far. It connected
the Rosicrucians and Templars in England, like Bacon, with the story of the Templars
after their arrival from France at the time of Philippe the Fair, and their subsequent
return to France as the Scots Guard. It also connects this group with the Priory of Sion.
The figure which encapsulated these connections was James VI of Scotland, who
succeeded Elizabeth I and became James I of England and Scotland. He was the only
child of Mary Queen of Scots. The Stuart bloodline with its connections to the reptilian
Merovingians was now on the throne of both England and Scotland. Under James’s
166
patronage, the Scottish and Templar knowledge and the Rosicrucian knowledge of
Francis Bacon and others could merge and become united under the name, Freemasonry.
So could the knowledge of the reptilian House of Lorraine, another bloodline of King
James. He had the whole set, this guy. For this reason, and others, you find the names
‘James’ and ‘St James’ appear many times in the titles of Brotherhood companies,
organisations and their locations. The American ambassador to London is known as the
Ambassador to the Court of St James. Close to the Houses of Parliament in London you
find St James’s Square and here is the headquarters of the Conservative Party; the
biggest British trade union, the Transport Union; a building owned by the Scottish
reptilian bloodline, the Keswicks (of which more later); and in the centre is a massive
round church dedicated to St John (Nimrod).
One of his first acts as King James I of England and Scotland was to award a
knighthood to Bacon, and James would later appoint him Solicitor-General, Attorney-
General, Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and, in 1618, Lord Chancellor and Baron
Verulam. Later Bacon was prosecuted on corruption charges and retired from official
public life. In those early years under James I, there was a wonderful opportunity to
circulate the suppressed knowledge of the ancient world if that was really the motivation
of the James-Bacon esoteric underground. But again we have the contradiction. The very
opposite happened. James employed Bacon to edit the King James version of the Bible
and launched a vicious condemnation of ‘witches and wizards’ - those among the general
population who used and communicated the esoteric knowledge. More than that, he
embarked on a vicious slaughter of them, killing thousands, and he even wrote a book
explaining how they should be identified and dealt with. Why do that if, as claimed, the
motivation of this underground stream was to protect and eventually circulate such
information? Because that was never the idea. It helps if people whose support you need
think that is your motivation, but when it comes to the crunch you walk the other way.
The hierarchy of the groups I have been highlighting don’t want to make the knowledge
available, they want to hoard it and use it to gain power on a global scale. To be honest
I’m fed up with hearing of how the Freemasons, Templars, Rosicrucians, Bacon and
others, have been protectors of the knowledge when every time the climate has been
right to make it public, including today, the opportunity is spurned. It’s bullshit. They
know that knowledge is power if you have it and others do not, so the last thing their
hierarchy wants is an informed population. Throughout Europe, the wizards and witches,
the sensitives and psychics in other words, were burned, drowned, jailed and tortured, on
the orders of people like King James and Martin Luther. Yet these were initiates using
the same knowledge the ‘wizards and witches’ were using and communicating. There
were two esoteric undergrounds and still are. The one among the people which passed on
the knowledge in secret, myth and fairy tale, to avoid the wrath of the religious and
political establishment; and the Babylonian Brotherhood underground which wanted that
knowledge for itself to control and manipulate the religious and political establishment.
So the peoples’ underground was, and is, constantly attacked and pursued by the
Brotherhood underground. Some 250,000 were murdered for being ‘wizards and witches’,
167
30,000 of them in the British Isles alone.27
The Freemasonic movement was to become a sort of central meeting place and
coordinator for the various elements of the Brotherhood network. W. Wynn Westcott,
founder of the Hermetic (and Satanic) Order of the Golden Dawn, knew the true
background to Freemasonry because of his connections to the esoteric underground. He
wrote in his work, The Magical Mason, that the Freemasons originate from the Essenes,
the Pharisee (Levite) Jews, the ancient mystery schools of Egypt and Greece, the Vehm-
Gerichte of Westphalia, Germany, the Roman Collegia, the French Compagnons, and
the Rosicrucians.28 The official (and inaccurate) story is that Freemasonry emerged
from the lodges of the stone masons who worked on the great churches and cathedrals,
craftsmen with the knowledge of sacred geometry. They had enjoyed a close connection
with the Knights Templar since the building of the Gothic cathedrals. But by the time of
Henry VIII, their work was in decline. Far from building more cathedrals, Henry set
about looting the monasteries and the fraternities, brotherhoods and guilds to raise some
much needed cash. To survive, the Masonic guilds began to open their doors to non-
Masons, people from the professional classes, the businessmen, merchants, landowners
and the aristocracy. It was now freemasonry and, of course, the newcomers took over
the show very quickly, we are told. What happened, in truth, is that the Knights
Templar-Rosicrucian-Babylonian Brotherhood underground, created their own initiation
structure to pass on the secret knowledge to the chosen few and keep it out of
circulation. The mason guilds were simply a cover story.
Freemasonry was born in Scotland among the familiar Brotherhood bloodline
families, especially the reptilian St Clair/Sinclairs. They were based at Rosslyn or
Roslin Castle just south of Edinburgh in a region steeped in Templar tradition. Like all
of these bloodline families, they periodically change their name to hide their origins.
This line became the St Clairs while they were living in Normandy before they crossed
the English Channel with William the Conqueror for the Battle of Hastings in 1066 and
became the Scottish Sinclairs. Five of the nine St Clairs who took part in the battle were
William’s first cousins and one of them settled in Scotland to found the Scottish
dynasty.29 The family apparently named themselves St Clair after a martyred hermit
named Clare, or that’s the official line.30 They were the Norsemen who came down from
Scandinavia to occupy what they called Normandy, but their true origin was with the
white races and reptile-Aryans which emerged from the Near East and the Caucasus.
The foundations were laid for Rosslyn Chapel in 1446 and it was completed in the
1480s. It is a mass of esoteric and later Freemasonic symbolism and it is like a shrine
for the Brotherhood. The Sinclairs had extensive connections to the underground
networks in France, Lorraine and Guise, and with Scandinavia, Denmark and the onetime
Brotherhood financial centre in Venice. They were steeped in the reptilian
network. A Sinclair went ashore in North America with the Black Nobility Venetian,
Nicolo Zeno, a century before Christopher Columbus would do so officially. One of the
symbols at Rosslyn Chapel is the Pagan vegetation god or ‘Green Man’. Tim Wallace-
Murphy wrote in his official history of Rosslyn Chapel that the Green Man can be
168
identifiedwith Tammuz, the dying and resurrecting god of Babylon and an aspect of
Nimrod. Tammuz, and other names for the same deity, was often depicted to have a green
face. This includes Osiris, the husband-brother of Isis. The story of Robin Hood in his
‘Lincoln green’ originated with this Green Man deity. Robin Hood began in the original
legend as a species of ‘fairy’ and he was also known as Green Robin, Robin of
Greenwood and Robin Goodfellow.31 His “Shakespearean” version, Puck, in A
Midsummer Night’s Dream, presided over fertility and sexual rites at the summer solstice.
On May 1st, May Day, they had the May Pole ceremonies. The May Pole is a phallic
symbol dedicated to the goddess of sexuality and fertility and on that day every village
virgin would be a Queen of the May (Queen Semiramis). Many would end up in the green
wood to undergo a sexual initiation with a youth playing the role of Robin Hood or Robin
Goodfellow. The children that often followed nine months later were the origin of the now
common names Robinson and Robertson.32 The story of Robin Hood was another
symbolic tale to maintain the memory of Pagan sexual ritual amid the crossed legs and
scowling faces of orthodox Christianity. A play called Robin Hood and Little John was
performed every May and June at Rosslyn by gypsies or other travelling performers. Sir
William Sinclair became, for a time, a protector of gypsies when legislation was passed in
Scotland designed to wipe them out. The gypsies originated in Egypt and they carried the
knowledge from place to place and generation to generation. This is why they have been
so persecuted and hounded until most of their knowledge disappeared.
The biggest rite of world Freemasonry are the 33 degrees (initiation levels) called
the Scottish Rite. It is named after that little country in the north of the British Isles
because that is where many of the ancient bloodlines settled to be followed by the
Templar knowledge at the time of Philippe the Fair. Now the Templars had re-emerged
publicly under another name - Freemasonry. The other main stream of the ‘craft’ is the
York Rite, after which New York is named, which is the centre of United States
Freemasonry to this day. Some researchers believe that the Priory of Sion wrested
control of the Scottish and York Rites from the Templars who later crossed the English
Channel to found French Freemasonry. This may be true, but in the end they are all the
same organisation at the highest level. You can still see the influence of the Templars in
the degrees of the York Rite. The top degree is the Knights Templar Degree, followed
by the Knights of Malta Degree and the Red Cross Degree. But the official degrees are
only what they admit to. Above these levels are what I call the Illuminati degrees which
very, very few people even know about, never mind reach. The vast majority of
Freemasons never progress beyond the bottom three levels, the ‘blue degrees’, and they
are used as a front of respectability to hide the real Agenda which the rank and file are
not aware of. Albert Pike was the head of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite
of Freemasonry in the United States in the last century and is considered a Freemasonic
‘god’ in America. His statue stands in Washington DC. In his Freemasonic book,
Morals And Dogma, he writes on page 819:
“The blue degrees are, but the outer court or portico of the temple. Part of the symbols are
169
displayed there to the initiate, but he is intentionally misled by false interpretations. It is not
intended that he shall understand them, but it is intended that he shall imagine he
understands them.”
Put another way, keep them in the dark and feed them bullshit. This is the classic
secret society structure in which only the highest levels know what is really going on.
The rest are sold a myth. In the mid-i 7th century, the Thirty Years War between the
Protestant and Catholic believers had turned Europe into a cauldron of death and
mayhem. It was feared at one stage that the new Protestant movement would be routed
and the rule of Rome restored. Britain became a safe haven for the Protestant cause,
particularly under the royal house of Stuart, which ironically was not Christian at all.
But the split the Protestants created in the Christian Church, and the way the power of
Rome was thus diminished, suited the Brotherhood. The British Isles became the focus
for esoteric thought in Europe and the creation of Freemasonry wove these strands
together in one structure. Freemasonry was to quickly become a vehicle for political
and economic manipulation, its members working through all sides to the same end.
The Agenda in this period was to diminish the power of the monarchies in Europe and
replace them with political systems designed in a way that allowed the Brotherhood to
control them. It was based on the structure in ancient Sumer and Babylon and this has
continued to this very day. A series of civil wars were triggered throughout Europe
which either removed the monarchy or made them mere puppets. In the English Civil
War of 1642-1646, the Stuart king and Freemason, Charles I, was defeated and later
executed. The monarchy was briefly overthrown and replaced by a Lord Protector,
Oliver Cromwell, also a Freemason. This may sound strange and contradictory, but it
isn’t. The Agenda is the prime motivation, in fact the only motivation, of the
Brotherhood. If that means replacing a Freemason and a Stuart who won’t follow the
Agenda with a Freemason who will, then so be it. The end of the royal line for the
Stuarts is not as significant as it would seem. The Brotherhood Elite and the reptilians
do not care who introduces their Agenda, so long as someone does and the most
influential of their bloodlines are not always the most famous people. Often the most
influential ones work in the background where the real power lies. The Stuarts were fine
for a while, but everyone is expendable to the cause and by now the structures were in
place to run countries via the secret society networks, using frontmen and women. The
power of a single monarch was over and that was certainly the case in the UK after the
beheading of Charles I. Even when the monarchy was restored with Charles II, it was a
puppet of the Brotherhood and took orders in the same way that Oliver Cromwell did
when, in 1655, he allowed ‘Jewish’ (Aryan) people to return to England for the first
time since they were excluded by Edward I in 1290. As I described earlier, this was the
time when the Black Nobility in Amsterdam were preparing to put their man, William
of Orange, on the British throne.
Everything interconnects with everything else in the most remarkable way because it
is being coordinated from the lower fourth dimension which can see into this one. The
170
Christian Church was split into rival and violent factions by the Rosicrucian, Martin
Luther, and the emergence of a vicious brand of the Protestant faith called Calvinism,
later known as the Puritans. Its founder ‘John Calvin’ was actually Jean Caum from
Noyons, France, who was educated at the Brotherhood-controlled, College du Montagu.
This is also where Ignatius Loyola, the ‘Catholic’ founder of the Society of Jesus, the
Jesuits, was educated. Caum moved to Paris and then to Geneva, Switzerland, where he
was known as Cohen. This name relates to ‘priest’ and goes back to the Egyptian
mystery schools. In Geneva he developed, or someone else did, the philosophy known
as Calvinism. He changed his name again from Cohen to Calvin to make it more
acceptable to the English who now became the prime target of this new religion - yet
another created by the same source as all the others. Calvinism was a designer religion
for the next stage of the plan. It focused rigidly on the ten commandments of ‘Moses’
and the Old Testament texts (taken literally, not symbolically of course). But this was
the crucial bit. Up to this point the Christian religion had banned usury, the charging of
interest on loans. Now, with the Black Nobility bankers manoeuvring to take over
England, a Christian country, using the outwardly ‘Christian’ aristocracy, the time had
come to end that rule and make usury the norm. Calvinism, therefore, supported the
charging of interest and one of the great beneficiaries was Switzerland, where the plot
was conceived, because it became the centre of the world’s private banking system.
Another role for Calvinism was to insist on the burning of witches and in so doing take
more of the secret knowledge out of public circulation. The Black Nobility wanted their
man, William of Orange, on the throne and to do this they had to remove Charles I, the
guy they eventually beheaded in 1649. Calvinism was used to ferment unrest with the
monarchy and along came the Freemason and Calvinist, Oliver Cromwell, to play his
part in yet another manufactured conflict as his Roundheads met the Royalists in the
English Civil War. On September 3rd 1921, a publication by Lord Alfred Douglas
called Plain English presented the contents of correspondence relating to the plot
behind the murder of Charles I. It said that volumes of records had been found in the
Synagogue of Mulheim by a L. A. Van Valckert. They were written in German and had
been lost since the Napoleonic Wars. An entry for June 6th 1647, from Oliver Cromwell
to an Ebenezer Pratt, says (in modern language):
“In return for financial support will advocate admission of Jews to England; this, however,
impossible while Charles living. Charles cannot be executed without trial, adequate grounds
for which at present do not exist. Therefore, advise that Charles be assassinated, but will
have nothing to do with procuring an assassin, though willing to help with his escape.”
Ebenezer Pratt’s reply was on July 12th 1647:
“Will grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted. Assassination too
dangerous. Charles should be given the opportunity to escape. His recapture will then
make trial and execution possible. The support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms
171
until trial commences.”34
This publication was so revealing that the Brotherhood network had the publisher,
Lord Alfred Douglas, imprisoned on the basis of an alleged ‘libel’ printed in his paper
about Winston Churchill. How it is possible to libel a Satanist like Churchill is rather hard
to comprehend. That correspondence between Cromwell and Pratt was mirrored by actual
events. On November 12th 1647, Charles I was allowed to escape and in fact was ‘hidden’
on the Isle of Wight, just off the southern coast of England, where I am writing this
section. Charles was recaptured and when he and Parliament appeared to be close to an
agreement that would spare his life, Cromwell, by now Lord Protector, dismissed all the
members supporting an agreement. History calls what remained the ‘Rump Parliament’.
Another trial was ordered by Cromwell because his agreement with his backers in
Amsterdam was that Charles would be executed. The indictment against Charles was
drawn up by Isaac Dorislaus, the agent in England of Manasseh ben Israel, one of the
main funders from Amsterdam of the Cromwell ‘revolution’ ~ The outcome of the ‘trial’
was the public beheading of Charles and this was followed by Cromwell allowing the
‘Jews’ to return to England. I would stress again that we are not, in truth, talking about
Jews, but the financial hierarchy of the Black Nobility and the Brotherhood who hide
behind the term ‘Jews’ and mercilessly manipulate the mass of those who call themselves
Jewish. After Cromwell’s death in 1661, many of his Calvinist-Puritan followers headed
for America to escape ‘religious persecution’ following the reinstatement of the monarchy
under Charles II. These were the religious fanatics who slaughtered the Native Americans
under the banner of ‘God’. The Black Nobility bankers in Amsterdam caused a financial
depression in England to undermine Charles II. Eventually a ‘peace’ deal was struck
between Holland and England in 1667 in which William of Orange (Black Nobility)
would marry Mary, daughter of the Duke of York. When Charles II died in 1685, it was
the Duke of York who became King James II. Now all the Brotherhood had to do was
remove him from the throne and their guy would be King of England. They began to
bribe James II’s most influential aristocratic supporters and the first to bite was John
Churchill, the reptilian Duke of Marlborough. The Commissioner of Public Accounts
revealed that Churchill had taken bribes totalling some £60,000 (an absolute fortune in
those days) from representatives of Dutch and Spanish financial families like Sir Solomon
de Medina and Antonio Machado. Researcher, Euctace Mullins, puts it at more like
£350,000.36
John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough, was an ancestor of Britain’s wartime prime
minister, Sir Winston Churchill, and the Churchill-Brotherhood connections continue to
this day. Sir Winston’s daughter-in-law, Pamela, married the American, Averell Harriman,
one of the great Brotherhood manipulators of the 20th century and much documented in ..
And The Truth Shall Set You Free. Pamela Harriman, who had formerly been married to
Winston’s son, Randolph, became very influential in the American Democratic Party and
is widely named as the force behind Bill Clinton’s election as US president. She was
rewarded by being made US ambassador to the key Brotherhood city of Paris, where she
172
died in 1997 at the age of 76. Her son, also named Winston, is a British member of
Parliament who is close to the Rothschilds. Pamela Churchill-Harriman dated Elie de
Rothschild before marrying Averell Harriman. In 1995 the Churchill family were given
£12,500 million of National Lottery money when they sold some of Sir Winston
Churchill’s Second World War speeches to ‘the nation’. The speeches were purchased
with this public money by the National Heritage Memorial Board, chaired by... Lord
Jacob Rothschild. Just a coincidence, nothing to worry about. The Churchill-Harrimans
are bloodline families. One of Pamela Harriman’s ancestors conspired with the Percy
family, ancestors of George Bush, in the attempt to blow up the Houses of Parliament in
the so-called Gun Powder Plot led by Guy Fawkes on November 5th 1605. As a
Harriman, Pamela represented the ‘Democratic’ wing of the Brotherhood while the
Bush’s, close associates and business partners of the Harrimans, represent the
‘Republican’ wing. Both have answered to the same master to ensure that the United
States, like every other country, is a one-party-state. The Bush family are close friends
of the Windsors, which shouldn’t surprise anyone who has read this far because both
are shape-shifting reptilians. Bush and his associate, the Brotherhood’s tireless global
manipulator, Henry Kissinger, have both been knighted by Queen Elizabeth II.
The modern version of Freemasonry expanded rapidly from its obscure beginnings
among the Templars and other mystery initiates. The Grand Lodge of England - the
centre of the network - was officially formed on June 24th 1717. This is St John the
Baptist’s Day, a sacred day for the Knights Templar and an obvious connection to the
Knights of St John of Jerusalem (Malta). John the Baptist is the patron saint of both
the Freemasons and the Templars because Oannes was another form of John in
Babylon and Oannes was a another name for Nimrod. The Irish Grand Lodge followed
some six or seven years later. Most of the field lodges which emerged among the
regiments in the British army were warranted by the Irish and not the English Grand
Lodge. The Scottish clans introduced Freemasonry to their blood brethren in France
and I should mention one man in this regard, Andrew Michael Ramsey, a tutor to the
Scottish Stuart pretender to the throne, Bonnie Prince Charlie. Ramsey was born in
Scotland in the I 680s and was a close friend of Isaac Newton, the Grand Master of the
Priory of Sion. He was a member of many Elite groupings, including a sort of
Rosicrucian society called the Philadelphians (named after the city from where the
American War of Independence was orchestrated) and the French chivalric Order of St
Lazarus. Many of these Elite groups give their initiates esoteric names and Ramsey’s
Brotherhood name was ‘Chevalier’.37 He was a significant factor in the spread of
Freemasonry and he is particularly remembered in Freemasonic circles for two versions
of the same speech he made in December 1736 and March 1737. It became known as
Ramsey’s Oration and in it he charted some of the history of Freemasonry. He confirmed
that it was derived from the mystery schools of antiquity which worshipped Diana,
Minerva and Isis (Semiramis). He said that Freemasonry had its origins in the Holy Land
at the time of the Crusades (the Knights Templar) and did not originate with stone
masons. Ramsey said that ‘our Order’ (the Templars) had formed an intimate union with
173
the Knights of St John of Jerusalem (Malta) and from that time: “our lodges took the
name of Lodges of St John”.38 In France, Freemasonry, with Ramsey’s keen support,
spawned a particularly important strand, a fusion between Freemasonry and the
Jacobite movement which became known as Grand Orient Freemasonry. There are also
Grand Orient networks in others countries like Brazil and Portugal. Grand Orient means
Grand East and its rituals are inspired by the worship of Zoroaster in Persia, Ishtar and
Tammuz (Semiramis and Nimrod) in Babylon, Demeter, Persephone and Dionysus in
Greece, Aphrodite and Adonis in Syria, Isis and Osiris in Egypt, and Mithra in Persia.39
The Grand Orient in France was to be the focus behind the manipulation and
coordination of the French Revolution. From the Brotherhood’s point of view, this
‘peoples’ revolution had nothing to do with freedom and everything to do with its
Agenda for global control. The famous cry of the French revolutionaries: “Liberty,
Equality, Fraternity”, is a Freemasonic motto.
No comments:
Post a Comment