Control of the media
The names Rothschild, Rockefeller, Kissinger and Carrington appear on the boards and
‘advisory’ boards of global media corporations and that’s no surprise. To control humanity
through the mind and emotions you simply have to control the media. Without that it’s
impossible. This is made so much easier because the overwhelming majority of journalists
in the world, including the so-called ‘big names’ in each country, are either agents for the
Brotherhood (the small minority) or they don’t know their arse from their elbow when it
comes to understanding what is going on in the world. I’ve been a journalist and so I have
seen both sides and what is termed the communications industry is really the blind
(journalists) leading the blind (their readers and viewers). My experience as a journalist,
and as the target of journalists, has shown me very clearly how remarkably few brain cells
you need to do the job. Every day on television stations all over the world, journalists and
correspondents give their viewers the official version of the event they are reporting.
“White House sources say this..., the Prime Minister says that..., the FBI say the other... “In
all my time in journalism I cannot recall a single conversation in a newsroom that didn’t
reflect the official version of life and the world. Most journalists are not manipulating, they
are simply stunningly uninformed and often incredibly arrogant. They believe that if
anything of magnitude was going on they would know about it because they are
‘journalists’. In truth they are the last to know. Arrogance and naivete, the mental
combination that produces so many journalists, is a telling and highly destructive
combination. Add a padlocked mind and you’ve got the job. One BBC interviewer said to
me in all seriousness that we should be no more concerned about the membership of the
Freemasons than we should the membership of the local squash club. I’m not kidding. I
have given many journalists the story of what is going on and they have either dismissed it
without even looking at the evidence or they have ridiculed the information without
looking at the evidence. I remember meeting a guy, I think his name was Taylor or
something, in Los Angeles in early 1997. He worked for The Observer newspaper in
London. I told him about the paedophile activities of George Bush and his drug running
operation. I offered to put him in touch with some of those who had been abused by Bush.
What did this ‘journalist’ do? He went away and wrote an article making personal attacks
on me, including the fact that my eyes appeared bloodshot. Not surprising after a non272
stop speaking tour of Australia, New Zealand and the United States over a period of two
months, but how can anyone write about the state of someone’s eyes when they are
being offered, as he put it himself, the “Story of the century”? Because he’s a journalist,
that’s why I offered to put the British Sunday People in contact with similar sources, but
they didn’t want to know. As the old saying goes: “You cannot bribe or twist the great
British journalist, but seeing what they will do unbribed, there’s no reason to.” Of
course there are journalists who are exceptions, and honourable ones, but they are so, so
rare and ask them what happens when they try to write the story as it really is.
Journalists dance to the official tune and become the copy typists and town criers for
the official version of life. They are the ‘gofers’ for those higher up the media pyramid. At
the top are bankers who provide the funds to buy the media groups. These bankers also
control the major industries and business networks and the newspaper, television, and
radio operations cannot survive without the advertising revenue from these people. The
threat to stop advertising has led to many an expose of the truth ending up in the bin.
Below the bankers and industrialists come the media ‘barons’, the Murdochs, Blacks,
O’Reillys, and Packers. They toe the line of the funders and advertisers and they appoint
their editors to make sure that the same policy appears in the papers and broadcast media
day after day. The editor appoints the journalists and they have to follow the same line the
editor has been told to follow. The journalist answers to the editor, the editor answers to the
proprietor, and the proprietor answers to the banks and the corporations - the Brotherhood.
This is what we call ‘news’. We are led to believe that the great media egos like Murdoch,
Packer, and Ted Turner don’t like each other. Maybe that’s true and maybe its a
smokescreen, it doesn’t really matter. Whichever of them heads an organisation, the same
policy prevails, so the Brotherhood could not care less which of their puppets owns a
newspaper because their policy will be followed whatever. These ‘barons’ are not in
control. They are frontmen, that’s all. Look at Ted Turner, the Council on Foreign
Relations member who was supposed to be taking on the system with his Cable News
Network (CNN). He sold out to Time Warner, one of the greatest Brotherhood operations
on the planet, and CNN pounds out the official line hour after hour, day after day. When
someone genuinely wants to start a television station or newspaper to tell the truth, they
can’t get advertising or funding or they have their share price undermined via the
unimaginable amounts of money the Brotherhood banks, corporations, and insurance
companies move around every day. This opens up such media operations to a hostile
takeover. The three television networks in the United States, CBS, ABC, and NBC are
controlled by members of the Round Table network and so are the Washington Post, Los
Angeles Times, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and a long, long list of others. The
same goes for country after country.
Two of the lesser known groups which make the point about control of the media are
Hollinger Inc. and ‘Independent’ Newspapers. Hollinger owns 68% of newspapers in
Canada and more than 250 papers and magazines worldwide, including major US
papers, The Jerusalem Post, and Telegraph Newspapers in London. Hollinger is a front
for British Intelligence. During the last world war, an Elite section of British
273
Intelligence called the Special Operations Executive formed a front organisation called
War Supplies Ltd under the leadership of two British agents, George Montagu Black and
Edward Plunkett Taylor. It was Taylor who later wrote the banking laws for the Bahamas
and the Cayman Islands. After the war this British Intelligence company continued under
the name of the Argus Corporation and more recently it changed its name again to
Hollinger. Today it is headed by Conrad Black, the son of the British spy, George
Montagu Black, who set it up in the first place. Conrad Black is a member of the inner
sanctum of the Bilderberg Group. His father was close to the Bronfman gangster family
who, like the Kennedys, made a fortune from running illegal booze during the
prohibition the Brotherhood themselves had introduced. The Bronfmans today own the
liquor giant, Seagrams, as well as a substantial drug running operation. On the ‘advisory’
board of Hollinger are Henry Kissinger, Lord Carrington, and Edmund de Rothschild!
Independent Newspapers is owned by the Irish billionaire and former rugby player, Tony
O’Reilly. It includes newspapers in Ireland, Britain, France, Portugal, Mexico, South
Africa, and New Zealand. The South African President, Nelson Mandela, spent
Christmas 1993 at O’Reilly’s holiday home at Nassau in the Bahamas and soon
afterwards the Irishman bought the Argus group, South Africa’s biggest newspaper
chain.4 This is now a mouthpiece for Mandela’s African National Congress (ANC). Since
1994, O’Reilly has bought 60% of the Argus Group, 43% of Newspaper Publishing in
Britain, 55% of Australian Provincial Newspapers, 25% of Irish Press Newspapers, and
44% of Wilson and Horton the largest newspaper group in New Zealand.5 He also has
extensive interests in cable television in Ireland, and radio and television in Australia and
New Zealand. His acquisitions will go on and money will be no object because for all his
self-promotion he is just a puppet. His Sunday Independent in Ireland devoted an eight
page supplement to him called “A Man For All Continents” and it included seventeen
photographs of him with his friends... Henry Kissinger (Bil, CFR,TC, RIIA, Comm
300), Margaret Thatcher (Bil), Valery Giscard D’Estaing (Bil), and Robert Mugabe. One
of O’Reilly’s close friends in Ireland is the former Prime Minister, Garret Fitzgerald (Bil,
TC).6 O’Reilly also idolises Churchill, apparently. His friendship with the Zimbawe
dictator, Robert Mugabe, began while O’Reilly was still chairman of Heinz and Mugabe
will still put a giant-sized can of Heinz beans on his head to amuse visitors to the State
House.7 In 1992, Mugabe joined O’Reilly at his mansion in County Kildare, Ireland, and
these two Jesuit-educated initiates celebrated high mass in a medieval private chapel
built around a crusader’s (Knights Templar) tomb.8 O’Reilly and his business associates
have since bought a 60% stake in Associated Newpapers of Zimbabwe (ANZ) with the
intention of launching a new English language daily.9
The names Rothschild, Rockefeller, Kissinger and Carrington appear on the boards and
‘advisory’ boards of global media corporations and that’s no surprise. To control humanity
through the mind and emotions you simply have to control the media. Without that it’s
impossible. This is made so much easier because the overwhelming majority of journalists
in the world, including the so-called ‘big names’ in each country, are either agents for the
Brotherhood (the small minority) or they don’t know their arse from their elbow when it
comes to understanding what is going on in the world. I’ve been a journalist and so I have
seen both sides and what is termed the communications industry is really the blind
(journalists) leading the blind (their readers and viewers). My experience as a journalist,
and as the target of journalists, has shown me very clearly how remarkably few brain cells
you need to do the job. Every day on television stations all over the world, journalists and
correspondents give their viewers the official version of the event they are reporting.
“White House sources say this..., the Prime Minister says that..., the FBI say the other... “In
all my time in journalism I cannot recall a single conversation in a newsroom that didn’t
reflect the official version of life and the world. Most journalists are not manipulating, they
are simply stunningly uninformed and often incredibly arrogant. They believe that if
anything of magnitude was going on they would know about it because they are
‘journalists’. In truth they are the last to know. Arrogance and naivete, the mental
combination that produces so many journalists, is a telling and highly destructive
combination. Add a padlocked mind and you’ve got the job. One BBC interviewer said to
me in all seriousness that we should be no more concerned about the membership of the
Freemasons than we should the membership of the local squash club. I’m not kidding. I
have given many journalists the story of what is going on and they have either dismissed it
without even looking at the evidence or they have ridiculed the information without
looking at the evidence. I remember meeting a guy, I think his name was Taylor or
something, in Los Angeles in early 1997. He worked for The Observer newspaper in
London. I told him about the paedophile activities of George Bush and his drug running
operation. I offered to put him in touch with some of those who had been abused by Bush.
What did this ‘journalist’ do? He went away and wrote an article making personal attacks
on me, including the fact that my eyes appeared bloodshot. Not surprising after a non272
stop speaking tour of Australia, New Zealand and the United States over a period of two
months, but how can anyone write about the state of someone’s eyes when they are
being offered, as he put it himself, the “Story of the century”? Because he’s a journalist,
that’s why I offered to put the British Sunday People in contact with similar sources, but
they didn’t want to know. As the old saying goes: “You cannot bribe or twist the great
British journalist, but seeing what they will do unbribed, there’s no reason to.” Of
course there are journalists who are exceptions, and honourable ones, but they are so, so
rare and ask them what happens when they try to write the story as it really is.
Journalists dance to the official tune and become the copy typists and town criers for
the official version of life. They are the ‘gofers’ for those higher up the media pyramid. At
the top are bankers who provide the funds to buy the media groups. These bankers also
control the major industries and business networks and the newspaper, television, and
radio operations cannot survive without the advertising revenue from these people. The
threat to stop advertising has led to many an expose of the truth ending up in the bin.
Below the bankers and industrialists come the media ‘barons’, the Murdochs, Blacks,
O’Reillys, and Packers. They toe the line of the funders and advertisers and they appoint
their editors to make sure that the same policy appears in the papers and broadcast media
day after day. The editor appoints the journalists and they have to follow the same line the
editor has been told to follow. The journalist answers to the editor, the editor answers to the
proprietor, and the proprietor answers to the banks and the corporations - the Brotherhood.
This is what we call ‘news’. We are led to believe that the great media egos like Murdoch,
Packer, and Ted Turner don’t like each other. Maybe that’s true and maybe its a
smokescreen, it doesn’t really matter. Whichever of them heads an organisation, the same
policy prevails, so the Brotherhood could not care less which of their puppets owns a
newspaper because their policy will be followed whatever. These ‘barons’ are not in
control. They are frontmen, that’s all. Look at Ted Turner, the Council on Foreign
Relations member who was supposed to be taking on the system with his Cable News
Network (CNN). He sold out to Time Warner, one of the greatest Brotherhood operations
on the planet, and CNN pounds out the official line hour after hour, day after day. When
someone genuinely wants to start a television station or newspaper to tell the truth, they
can’t get advertising or funding or they have their share price undermined via the
unimaginable amounts of money the Brotherhood banks, corporations, and insurance
companies move around every day. This opens up such media operations to a hostile
takeover. The three television networks in the United States, CBS, ABC, and NBC are
controlled by members of the Round Table network and so are the Washington Post, Los
Angeles Times, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and a long, long list of others. The
same goes for country after country.
Two of the lesser known groups which make the point about control of the media are
Hollinger Inc. and ‘Independent’ Newspapers. Hollinger owns 68% of newspapers in
Canada and more than 250 papers and magazines worldwide, including major US
papers, The Jerusalem Post, and Telegraph Newspapers in London. Hollinger is a front
for British Intelligence. During the last world war, an Elite section of British
273
Intelligence called the Special Operations Executive formed a front organisation called
War Supplies Ltd under the leadership of two British agents, George Montagu Black and
Edward Plunkett Taylor. It was Taylor who later wrote the banking laws for the Bahamas
and the Cayman Islands. After the war this British Intelligence company continued under
the name of the Argus Corporation and more recently it changed its name again to
Hollinger. Today it is headed by Conrad Black, the son of the British spy, George
Montagu Black, who set it up in the first place. Conrad Black is a member of the inner
sanctum of the Bilderberg Group. His father was close to the Bronfman gangster family
who, like the Kennedys, made a fortune from running illegal booze during the
prohibition the Brotherhood themselves had introduced. The Bronfmans today own the
liquor giant, Seagrams, as well as a substantial drug running operation. On the ‘advisory’
board of Hollinger are Henry Kissinger, Lord Carrington, and Edmund de Rothschild!
Independent Newspapers is owned by the Irish billionaire and former rugby player, Tony
O’Reilly. It includes newspapers in Ireland, Britain, France, Portugal, Mexico, South
Africa, and New Zealand. The South African President, Nelson Mandela, spent
Christmas 1993 at O’Reilly’s holiday home at Nassau in the Bahamas and soon
afterwards the Irishman bought the Argus group, South Africa’s biggest newspaper
chain.4 This is now a mouthpiece for Mandela’s African National Congress (ANC). Since
1994, O’Reilly has bought 60% of the Argus Group, 43% of Newspaper Publishing in
Britain, 55% of Australian Provincial Newspapers, 25% of Irish Press Newspapers, and
44% of Wilson and Horton the largest newspaper group in New Zealand.5 He also has
extensive interests in cable television in Ireland, and radio and television in Australia and
New Zealand. His acquisitions will go on and money will be no object because for all his
self-promotion he is just a puppet. His Sunday Independent in Ireland devoted an eight
page supplement to him called “A Man For All Continents” and it included seventeen
photographs of him with his friends... Henry Kissinger (Bil, CFR,TC, RIIA, Comm
300), Margaret Thatcher (Bil), Valery Giscard D’Estaing (Bil), and Robert Mugabe. One
of O’Reilly’s close friends in Ireland is the former Prime Minister, Garret Fitzgerald (Bil,
TC).6 O’Reilly also idolises Churchill, apparently. His friendship with the Zimbawe
dictator, Robert Mugabe, began while O’Reilly was still chairman of Heinz and Mugabe
will still put a giant-sized can of Heinz beans on his head to amuse visitors to the State
House.7 In 1992, Mugabe joined O’Reilly at his mansion in County Kildare, Ireland, and
these two Jesuit-educated initiates celebrated high mass in a medieval private chapel
built around a crusader’s (Knights Templar) tomb.8 O’Reilly and his business associates
have since bought a 60% stake in Associated Newpapers of Zimbabwe (ANZ) with the
intention of launching a new English language daily.9
No comments:
Post a Comment