AN EXAMINATION OF LOYALTIES

If loyalty is so important in the economic and social structure, it is necessary to examine
it further as itself.
In the field of Psychopolitics, loyalty means simply `alignment'. It means, more fully,
alignment with the goals of the Communist State. Disloyalty means entirely misalignment,
and more broadly, mis-alignment with the goals of the Communist State.
When we consider that the goals of the Communist State are to the best possible benefit
of the masses, we can see that dis- loyalty, as a term, can embrace Democratic alignment.
Loyalty to persons not communistically indoctrinated would be quite plainly a misalignment.
The cure of disloyalty is entirely contained in the principles of alignment. All that it is
necessary to do, where disloyalty is encountered, is to align the purposes of the individual
toward the goals of Communism, and it will be discovered that a great many
circumstances hitherto distasteful in his existence will cease to exist. A heart, or a kidney in rebellion against the remainder of the organism is being disloyal
to the remainder of the organism. To cure that heart or kidney it is actually only
necessary to bring its activities into alignment with the remainder of the body.
The technologies of Psychopolitics adequately demonstrate the workability of this. Mild
shock of the electric variety can, and does, produce the re-cooperation of a rebellious
body organ. It is the shock and punishment of surgery which, in the main, accomplishes
the re-alignment of a disaffected portion of the body, rather that the surgery itself. It is the
bombardment of X-rays, rather than the therapeutic value of X-rays which causes some
disaffected organ to once again turn its attention to the support of the general organism.
While it is not borne out that electric shock has any therapeutic value, so far as making
the individual more sane, it is adequately brought out that its punishment value will
create in the patient a greater co-operative attitude. Brain surgery has no statistical data to recommend it
beyond its removal of the individual personality from amongst the paths of organs which
were not permitted to co-operate. these two Russian developments have never pretended
to alter the state of sanity. They are only effective and workable in introducing an
adequate punishment mechanism to the personality to make it cease and desist from its
courses and egotistical direction of the anatomy itself. It is the violence of the electric
shock and the surgery which is useful in subduing the recalcitrant personality, which is
all that stands in the road of the masses or the State. It is occasionally to be discovered
that the removal of the preventing personality by shock and surgery then permits the regrowth
and re-establish- ment of organs which have been rebelled against by that personality.
In that a well-regulated state is composed of organisms, not personalities, the use of
electric shock and brain surgery in Psychopolitics is clearly demonstrated.
The changing of loyalty consists, in its primary step, of the eradication of existing
loyalties. This can be done in one of two ways. First, by demonstrating that previously
existing loyalties have brought about perilous physical circumstances, such as
imprisonment, lack of recognition, duress, or privation, and second, by eradicating the
personality itself.
The first is accomplished by a steady and continuous indoc- trination of the individual in
the belief that his previous loyalties have been granted to an unworthy source. One of the
primary instances in this is creating circumstances which apparently derive from the
target of his loyalties, so as to rebuff the individual. As part of this there is the creation of
a state of mind in the indi- vidual by actually placing him under duress, and then
furnishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties
is, itself, the course of the duress. Another portion of this same method consists of
defaming or degrading the individual whose loyalties are to be changed to the target of
his loyalties, i.e., superiors or government, to such a degree that this target, at length,actually does hold the individual in disrepute, and so does rebuff him and serve to
convince him that his loyalties have been misplaced. These are the milder methods, but
have proven extremely effective. The greatest drawback in their prac- tice is that they require
time and concentration, the manufacture of false evidence, and a psychopolitical
operator's time.
In moments of expediency, of which there are many, the personality itself can be
rearranged by shock, surgery, duress, privation and, in particular, the best of
psychopolitical tech- niques, implantation, with the technologies of neo-hypnotism. Such
duress must have in its first part a defamation of the loyal- ties, and its second, the
<implanation> of new loyalties. A good and experienced psychopolitical operator,
working under the most favourable circumstances, can, by the use of psychopolitical
technologies, alter the loyalties of an individual so deftly that his own companions will
not suspect that they have changed. This, however, require considerably more finesse
than is usually neces- sary to the situation. Mass neo-hypnotism can accomplish more or
less the same results when guided by an experienced psycho- political operator. An end
goal in such a procedure would be the alteration of the loyalties of an entire nation in a
short period of time by mass neo-hypnotism, a thing which has been effec- tively
accomplished among the less-usable states of Russia.
It is adequately demonstrated that loyalty is entirely lacking in that mythical commodity
known as "spiritual quality". Loyalty is entirely a thing of dependence, economic or
mental, and can be changed by the crudest implementations. Observation of workers in
their factories or fields demonstrates that they easily grand loyalty to a foreman or a
woman, and then as easily aban- don it and substitute another individual, revulsing, at the
same time, toward the person to whom loyalty was primarily granted. The queasy
insecurity of the masses in Capitalistic nations finds this more common than in an
enlightened State such as Russia. In Capitalistic states, dependencies are so craven, wants
and privation are so exaggerated, that loyalty is entirely without ethical foundation and
exists only in the realm of dependency, duress, or demand.
It is fortunate that Communism so truly approaches an ideal state of mind, for this brings
a certain easiness into any changing of loyalties, since all other philosophies extant and
practiced on Earth today are degraded and debased, compared to Communism. It is then with a certain security that a psychopolitical operator functions, for he
knows that he can change the loyalty of an individual to a more ideal level by reason
alone, and only expediency makes it necessary to employ the various shifts of psychopolitical technology. Any man who cannot be persuaded into Communist rationale
is, of course, to be regarded as some- what less than sane, and it is, therefore, completely
justified to use the techniques of insanity upon the non-Communist.
In order to change loyalty it is necessary to establish first the existing loyalties of the
individual. The task made very simple in view of the fact that Capitalistic and Fascistic
nations have no great security in the loyalty of their subjects. And it may be found that
the loyalties of the subjects, as we call any person against whom psychopolitical
technology is to be exerted, are already faint to require eradication. It is generally only
necessary to persuade with the rationale and overwhelming reasonability of Communism
to have the person grant his loyalty to the Russia State. However, regulated only by the
importance of the subject, no great amount of time should be expended upon the
individual, but emotional duress, or electric shock, or brain surgery should be resorted to,
should Communist propaganda fail. In a case of a very important person, it may be
necessary to utilize the more delicate technologies of Psychopolitics so as to place the
person himself, and his associates, in ignorance of the operation. In this case a simple
<implanation> is used, with a maximum duress and command value. Only the most
skilled psychopolitical operator should be employed on such a project, as in this case of
the very important person, for a bungling might disclose the tampering with his mental
processes. It is much more highly recommended, if their is any doubt whatever about the
success of an operation against an important person, to select out as a psychopolitical
target persons in his vicinity in whom he is <emotionaly> involved. His Wife or children
normally furnish the best targets, and these can be operated against without restraint. In
securing the loyalty of a very important person one must place at his side a constant
pleader who enters a sexual or familial chord into the situation on the side of
Communism. It may not be necessary to make a Communist out of the wife, or the children, or one of the children, but it might prove efficacious to do so. In most instances,
however, this is not possible. By the use of various drugs, it is, in this modern age, and
well within the realm of psychopolitical reality, entirely too easy to bring about a state of
severe neurosis or insanity in the wife or children, and thus pass them, with full consent
of the important person and the government in which he exists, or the bureau in which he
is operating, into the hands of a psychopolitical operator, who then in his own laboratory,
without restraint or fear of investigation or censor can, with electric shock, surgery,
sexual attack, drugs, or other useful means, degrade or entirely alter the personality of a
family member, and create in that person a psychopolitical slave subject who then, on
command or signal, will perform outrageous actions, thus discrediting the important
person, or will demand, on a more delicate level, that certain measures be taken by the
important person, which measures are, of course, dictated by the psychopolitical operator.
Usually when the party has no real interest in the activities or decisions of the important
person, but merely wishes to remove him from effective action, the attention of the
psychopolitical operator need not be so intense, and the person need only be passed into the hands of some unwitting mental practitioner, who taught as he is by psychopolitical
operators, will bring about sufficient embarrassment.
When the loyalty of an individual cannot be swerved, and where the opinion, weight, or
effectiveness of the individual stands firmly in the road of Communist goals, it is usually
best to occasion a mild neurosis into the person by any available means, and then, having
carefully given him a history of mental imbalance, to see to it that he disposes of himself
by suicide, or to bring about his demise in such a way as to resemble suicide.
Psychopolitical operators have handled such situations <skilfully> tens of thousands of
times within and without Russia.
It is the firm principle of Psychopolitics that the person to be destroyed must be involved
at first or second hand in the stigma of insanity, and must have been placed in contact
with psycho- political operators or persons trained by them, with a maximum amount of
tumult and publicity. The stigma of insanity is properly placed at the door of such a person's reputation and is held there firmly by
bringing about irrational acts, either on his own part or in his vicinity. Such an activity
can be classified as a partial destruction of alignment, and if this destruction is carried
forward to its furthest extent the mis-alignment on the subject of all loyalties can be
considered to be complete, and alignment on new loyalties can be embarked upon safely.
By bringing about insanity or suicide on the part of the wife of an important political
personage, a sufficient mis-alignment has been instigated to change his attitude. And this,
carried forward firmly, or assisted by psychopolitical <implanation> can begin the
rebuilding of his loyalties, but now slanted in a more proper and fitting direction.
Another reason for the alignment of psychopolitical activities with the mis-alignment of
insanity is that insanity itself is a despised and disgraced state, and anything connected
with it is lightly viewed. Thus, a psychopolitical operator, working in the vicinity of an
insane person, can refute and disprove any accusa- tions made against him by
demonstrating that the family itself is tainted with mental imbalance. This is surprisingly
effective in Capitalistic countries where insanity is so thoroughly feared that no one
would dream of investigating any circumstances in its vicinity. Psychopolitical
propaganda works constantly and must work constantly to increase and build up this aura
of mystery surrounding insanity, and must emphasize the horribleness and hopelessness
of insanity in order to excuse non-therapeutic actions taken against the insane.
Particularly in Capitalistic countries, an insane person has no rights under law. No person
who is insane may hold property. No person who is insane may testify. Thus, we have an
excellent road along which we can travel toward our certain goal and destiny.
Entirely by bringing about public conviction that the sanity of a person is in question, it is
possible to discount and eradicate all of goals and activities of that person. By
demonstrating the insanity of a group, or even a government, it is possible, then, to cause its people to disavow it. By magnifying the general human reaction to insanity, through
keeping the subject of insanity itself forever before the public eye, and then, by utiliz- ing
this reaction by causing a revulsion on the part of a populace against its leader or leaders, it is possible to stop any government or movement.
It is important to know that the entire subject of loyalty is thus as easily handled as it is.
One of the first and foremost missions of the psychopolitician is to make an attack upon
Communism and insanity synonymous. It should become the definition of insanity, of the
paranoid variety, that, " A paranoid believes he is being attacked by Communists". Thus,
at once the support of the individual so attacking Communism will fall away and wither.
Instead of executing national leaders, suicide for them should be arranged under
circumstances which question their demise. In this way we can select out all opposition to
the Communist extension into the social orders of the world, and render populaces who
would oppose us leaderless, and bring about a state of chaos or mis-alignment into which
we can thrust, with great simplicity, the clear and forceful doctrines of Communism.
The cleverness of our attack in this field of Psychopolitics is adequate to avoid the
understanding of the layman and the usual stupid official, and by operating entirely under
the banner of authority, with the oft-repeated statement that the principles of
psychotherapy are too devious for common understanding, an entire revolution can be
effected without the suspicion of a populace until it is an accomplished fact.
As insanity is the maximum mis-alignment, it can be grasped to be the maximum weapon
in severance of loyalties to leaders and old social orders. Thus, it is of the utmost
importance that psychopolitical operatives infiltrate the healing arts of a nation marked
for conquest, and bring from that quarter continuous pressure against the population and
the government until at last the conquest is <affected>. This is the subject and goal of
Psycho- politics, itself.
In rearranging loyalties we must have a command of their values. In the animal the first
loyalty is to himself. This is destroyed by demonstrating errors to him, showing him that
he does not remember, cannot act or does not trust himself. The second loyalty is to his
family unit, his parents and brothers and sisters. This is destroyed by making a family
unit economically non-dependent, by lessening the value of marriage, by making an easiness of divorce and
by raising the children wherever possible by the State. The next loyalty is to his friends
and local environ- ment. This is destroyed by lowering his trust and bringing about reportings upon him allegedly by his fellows or the town or village authorities. The next
is to his State and this, for the purposes of Communism, is the only loyalty which should
exist once the state is founded as a Communist State. To destroy loyalty to the State all
manner of forbiddings for youth must be put into effect so as to disenfranchise them as
members of the Capitalist state and, by promises of a better lot under Com- munism, to
gain their loyalty to a Communist movement.
Denying a Capitalist country easy access to courts, bringing about and supporting
propaganda to destroy home, creating and continuous juvenile delinquency, forcing upon
the state all manner of practices to divorce the child from it will in the end create the
chaos necessary to Communism.
Under the saccharine guise of assistance to them, rigorous child labour laws are the best
means to deny the child any right in the society. By refusing to let him earn, by forcing
him into un- wanted dependence upon a grudging parent, by making certain in other
channels that the parent is never in other than economic stress, the child can be driven in
his teens into revolt. Delinquency will ensue.
By making readily available drugs of various kinds, by giving the teen-ager alcohol, by
praising his wildness, by stimulating him with sex literature and advertising to him or her
practices as taught at the Sexpol, the psychopolitical operator can create the necessary
attitude of chaos, idleness and worthlessness into which can then be cast the solution
which will give the teen-ager com- plete freedom everywhere -- Communism.
Should it be possible to continue conscription beyond any reasonable time by promoting
unpopular wars and other means, the draft can always stand as a further barrier to the
progress of youth in life, destroying any immediate hope to participate in his nations civil
life.
By these means the patriotism of youth for their Capitalistic flag can be dulled to a point
where they are no longer dangerous as soldiers. While this might require many decades to effect, Capitalism's short term view
will never envision the lengths across which we can plan.
If we could effectively kill the national pride and patriotism of just one generation we
will have won that country. Therefore there must be continual propaganda aboard to
undermine the loyalty of the citizens in general and the teen-ager in particular.
The role of the psychopolitical operator in this very strong. He can, from his position as
an authority on the mind, advise all manner of destructive measures. He can teach the
lack of control of this child at home. He can instruct, in an optimum situation, the entire
nation in how to handle children -- and instruct them so that the children, given no control, given no real home, can run wildly about with no responsibility for their nation
or them- selves.
The mis-alignment of the loyalty of youth to a Capitalistic nation sets the proper stage for
a realignment of their loyalties with Communism. Creating a greed for drugs, sexual
misbe- haviour and uncontrolled freedom and presenting this to them as a benefit of
Communism will with ease bring about our align- ment.
In the case of strong leaders amongst youthful groups, a psychopolitical operator can
work in many ways to use a discard that leadership. If it is to be used, the character of the
girl or boy must be altered carefully into criminal channels and a control by blackmail or
other means must be maintained. But where the leadership is not susceptible, where it
resists all persuasions and might become dangerous to our Cause, no pains must be
spared to direct the attention of the authorities to that person and to harass him in one
way or another until he can come into the hands of juvenile authorities. When this has
been effected it can be hoped that a psychopolitical operator, by reason of child adviser
status can, in the security of the jail and cloaked by processes of law, destroy the sanity of
that person. Particularly brilliant scholars, athletes and youth group leaders must be
handled in either one of these two ways.
In the matter of guiding the activities of juvenile courts, the psychopolitical operator
entertains here one of his easier tasks.A Capitalistic nation is so filled with injustice in general that a little more passes without
comment. In juvenile courts there are always persons with strange appetites whether
these be judges or police men or woman. If such do not exist they can be created. By
making available to them young boys or girls in the "security" of the jail or the detention
home, and by appearing with flash cameras or witnesses, one becomes equipped with a
whip ade- quate to direct all the future decisions of that person when these are needed.
The handling of youth cases by courts should be led further and further away from law
and further and further into "mental problems" until the entire nation thinks of" mental
problems" instead of criminals. This places vacancies everywhere in the courts, in the
offices of district attorneys and<,> on police staffs which could then be filled with
psychopolitical operators, who be- come then the judges of the land by their influence
and into their hands comes the total control of the criminal, without whose help a
revolution cannot ever be accomplished.
By stressing this authority over the problems of the youth and adults in courts one day the
demand for psychopolitical operators could become such that even the armed services
will use "authori- ties on the mind" to work their various justices and when this occurs
the armed forces of the nation then enter into our hands as solidly as if we commanded
them ourselves. With the slight bonus of having thus a skilled interrogator near every technician or handler of secret war apparatus, the country, in event of revolution, as did
Germany in 1918 and 1919 will find itself immobilized by its own Army and Navy fully
and entirely in Communist hands.
Thus the subject of loyalties and their re-alignment is in fact the subject of non-armed
conquest of an enemy.